Titles & Names: Our First Impressions of a Story
Would a Darcy by any other name be loved as much? If Mr. Bingley were to say: “Ladies, I’d like to introduce you to my friend Mr. Fitzwilliam Odieux,” would the Bennet girls have spent more time trying to figure out why there was an unfortunately odious French relative in this tall man’s past…or, like me, wonder how to spell his last name…rather than focusing on the man’s reputed fortune or his stately air? Hmm.
Or if Pemberely were, let’s imagine, simply called Thistle Park, would we all be as immediately excited to get that first glimpse of the estate? Perhaps…but there is something quite grand, in my opinion, about the names Jane Austen chose for her characters and her settings. There seems to be much thought and care behind their selection.
And, of course, all of us Austen lovers know Jane changed titles as she revised and restructured her novels. That Pride and Prejudice was originally called First Impressions. That Sense and Sensibility was, in the beginning, Elinor and Marianne. That Susan later became Northanger Abbey. And I wonder if she agonized over making these selections the way I do over my own: Maybe this is a good title, but is it the RIGHT title? Will readers find it clever? Fitting? Memorable?
I find myself asking these questions — often — because, as novelists, we’re charged with the naming of many people, numerous places and bunches of book titles, and I know as a reader that we all make predictions about a book based upon some of these names. My debut novel, According to Jane, was actually a rarity for me in that it had only one prior title. I’d originally called it My Best Friend Jane, but made the switch early (sometime in the middle of the second draft) and was delighted that it stuck through right to the end.
My second novel, Friday Mornings at Nine, however, went through no fewer than 30 possible titles (!!!) before my publishing house finally agreed on one. My upcoming fall novel, A Summer in Europe (which is like a modern-day A Room with a View), had over 40 possibilities…and, in the end, my long list mattered not one bit. My editor and the sales staff made the final title selection!
In the realm of my romantic comedies, where I am not only the author but the publisher, it’s been no simpler. On Any Given Sundae went through half a dozen titles before I found what I felt was the perfect one for the book. And my next digital novel coming in September, Double Dipping, had so many title changes I can barely count them all. I wrote the first draft of that romance back in 2002 when I’d named it Second to No One. But with every complete rewrite (of which there were MANY!!), the title changed. One of my favorites was Two Scoops, Hot Fudge & a Man On Top…but that was kind of long and wordy (although, admittedly, descriptive).
And, so, I ask you, what are some book titles, characters or place names that you especially loved? Names that you think added to the story because they were ideally suited to their novels? And are there any books you’d retitle if you could? For instance, would you change North and South to, say, Mr. Thornton Falls in Love? (By the way, did you know Elizabeth Gaskell originally called the book Margaret Hale but her publisher asked her to rename it? I just learned that today!) Would you rename Jane Eyre or Persuasion or Great Expectations? Would you call Gilbert Blythe from Anne of Green Gables something like Marcus Zimmerman or Charles Ashwood instead? And if you’ve titled a book of your own, how many names did you go through before you finally selected the one you felt was best?? I’d love to hear your thoughts!
47 Responses to Titles & Names: Our First Impressions of a Story
Our Novels
*Giveaways
Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.
P&P200
Our "real time" behind-the-scenes story of the events in
Pride & Prejudice is ongoing. To read all the portions in order visit The Writers Block or click the image above.
Find It!
Archive
Categories
Authors










Facebook
RSS
Twitter
The Writers Block
Oh, the agony of picking the right title-I feel your pain, Marilyn! My latest wip has about ten titles, and although I think I’ve found the right one, I’m still thinking!
Jane, isn’t it crazy how many we go through in hopes of getting it just right? Looking forward to hearing your new one sometime!!
You’ll probably get a big response from those of us who painstakingly went through that process of naming our books, only to have the publisher change them. (I love youre title, On Any Given Sundae – that is great!) My favorite title of my books was Something Like Regret, which unfortunately got changed to my least favorite title, Only Mr. Darcy Will Do. I came up with SLR when I was re-reading Pride and Prejudice at the part where Elizabeth is walking through Pemberley and realizes ‘of this place I could have been Mistress.’ Then thinking about her aunt and uncle not being able to visit saved her from feeling something like regret. That just about jumped out at me and I thought it was perfect. (I do understand, though, a publisher not wanting their book to have the same title as the previously published book.)
Kara, I’m glad you liked Sundae’s title!! But, ohhhh, I *really* know that feeling when you’re sure you’ve found the right one but you get overruled…sigh. And I always loved that “something like regret” line that Elizabeth said in P&P — it was such a great, self-reflective scene.
However, Only Mr. Darcy Will Do has the fabulous word DARCY in it! And I know enthusiastic readers can find Austenesque books easier when we have that as a clue…
I always get a kick when I recall that Conan Doyle had first thought to name Dr. John Watson “Ormond Sacker”. Elementary, my dear Sacker…doesn’t quite have the same ring.
LOL, Jane!! I never knew that. It’ll change the way I read those Sherlock Holmes books for sure now
.
I am so bad at picking titles. I told my editor that if I had named “Gone with the Wind” it would have been “It’s Not There Anymore.” I love “The Grapes of Wrath” and “Lonesome Dove.” “A Room with a View” is perfect. Best of luck with your new release.
Ha! Mary, that’s funny about your alternate Gone with the Wind title! At least you came up with one — I would’ve had no idea what how to encapsulate it! Thanks for the release wishes, too.
Just as important as the title are the character names. One of my favorite Regency romance writers named a character “Joshua.” Now, I love the name “Joshua,” as it is my son’s name. However, it does not fit the time period. Many gentlemen had given names that were once surnames.
The number of title changes is amazing. For example, I originally called my version of Persuasion “Wayward Love,” after song lyrics and the meaning of the word “wayward.” Unfortunately, my publisher thought readers wouldn’t get it. They simplified the title to “Captain Wentworth’s Persuasion.” It is too bland of a title for the book.
Regina, I like the name Joshua, too, but I agree it probably wasn’t the most common during the Regency. As for book titles, I know what you mean. Sigh. I’ve had to just put my trust in the publishing house and keep my fingers crossed that they know what readers will respond to…and I guess I’m thankful I don’t have to make title decisions for other authors’ books because I’d most likely choose the wrong one
.
Great stuff, Soul Sister! I don’t know if I’d rename any of my favorites. Well, I might joke about renaming THE CATCHER IN THE RYE to ONE CRAZY-A** NIGHT!
I do recall a book I read by Dean Koontz. The protagonist’s name was ‘Deucalion’ and for the life of me, I couldn’t get past it. Unfortunately, it detracted from an otherwise intriguing plot.
Very good point, Jill. Sci fi and fantasy can get away with a bizarre name, and maybe a book filled with Celts or swashbuckling Irishmen, but a contemporary should keep it simpler. Most editors would insist on changing something like that, but when one is Dean Koontz one can pretty much do whatever one wants!
Sharon and Jill~I agree. Though Koontz can get away with almost anything, I’m not sure I’d name a character something like that unless it was a parallel universe or the story was happening on another planet. Deucalion is pretty unusual!
Thanks, Jill!! I’m about due for a rereading of CATCHER, so I think I’ll retitle it to your version while I read it again!!
I learned about 3 books ago not to even title them any more. I had “Darcy #4″ and “Darcy #5″ then “Miss Darcy” (at least part of that title is in the final!) and my WIP is simply “Dr. George Darcy.” It is better not to agonize over it – did that a couple times – only to have it changed. LOL!
It is funny though that there is a great deal of truth to naming them well. A catchy name will grab a reader for sure. Catcher in the Rye is a good example. It is intriguing. That, of course, is why so many of our books have Darcy in the title. “Evocative” is my editor’s favorite word, and even if we do not agree on what is evocative I understand what she means.
However, I tend to be literal so would be searching through the whole book wondering when the rye was going to be making an appearance!
LOL about finding the “rye” in CATCHER, Sharon!!!
I know publishers want our books to be easy to find and identify. I know I spend WAY too much time trying to come up with titles that reference something significant mid-story or have 2 or 3 levels of meaning…only to find out that what the marketing people would like most is for the title to help readers immediately get a sense of what the book’s about!
First, I love all of your titles Marilyn. Recently I’ve learned that publishers like to rename books to something that the marketing department thinks will catch the readers’ eye. Which I suppose is in everyone’s best interest, right? But I’m sure you probably think of all of your works in the way you yourself titled them.
I too loved Kara’s Something Like Regret but the name change didn’t stop me from adding Only Mr. Darcy Will Do to my Austen collection. And HA! to Mary Simonsen. That’s an awesome alternate title to GWTW.
Pamala, thank you so much, my friend! And you’re definitely right in that having a title marketing can get behind is important for everyone involved! But title changes do force me to pause…and think…every single time someone asks me about my fall book. I have to stop myself from calling it what it was 3 or 4 titles ago
.
I love the fact that my titles None But You and For You Alone both come from the text of The Letter. No. 3, A Word, A Look comes from the letter as well. If I were published with a standard publisher I’m sure we’d be looking at Wentworth’s Return, Wentworth’s Ten Days in Bath, and Wentworth and Wife Move on With Life. Or some such nonsense.
Susan, I’m glad you’ve gotten to keep your titles as they are because I really love them
.
I was pondering just last night about how and why JA chose the name Fitzwilliam Darcy, and trying to imagine if the swoony sigh associated with the name Mr Darcy (at least in my mind) would be the same if his name had been something else. I guess it probably would unless it was something truly ridiculous like Mr Smiggles. It’d be neat to ask her where the names of her characters came from or if they were inspired by people she knew.
It must be frustrating to have the titles of your books constantly changing but I guess it’d be worth it to have them recignized and embraced by a larger audience.
Thanks, Monica! And I’m with you on the wondering about that Darcy name. It seems to bring with it a certain magic
. To me, it’s also a bit reminiscent of the words daring and archly — there’s nothing remotely ridiculous-sounding about it — though I’m sure there would be other good hero names that would qualify. I’d love to get to sit in on your conversation with Jane about her name choices and who inspired her characters!!
You have great titles but my favorites of yours are According to Jane and Any Given Sundae. Perfect for both books. Witches Anonymous by Misty Evans is another great title.
I agonize over my titles, and I’m not sure about my current one. But I do love the title of the last first and last books I’ve published: Cattitude and Galaxy Girls. I think they’re catchy.
Edie, when I first saw the title of your book, Cattitude, I thought it was positively inspired!! I think Galaxy Girls is very catchy, as is Witches Anonymous. But, titles aside, it’s the writing that wins me over, and I can’t wait to read Galaxy Girls soon. (You already know how much I loved Cattitude and Dragon Blues!)
I think Gone with The Wind may be the best title ever. I also love Kara’s original titles taken from phrases in P&P. They’re instantly recognizable to most Austen fans and offer an innate promise of something wonderful by association.
On the other hand, I’m currently reading a wonderful P&P modernization which I almost didn’t buy because to me the title (My BFF) seemed trite and indicated it may be geared toward teens. That being said, I would hate to have to come up with titles. I once said the title of my memoirs would be Pastry and Righteous Indignation. I have no idea why.
Bonnie, you may just have to write that memoir so you can use the great title you came up with!! I like it
. I haven’t read the P&P modernization you mentioned, My BFF, but I almost always enjoy those, so I’ll look for it!
It’s really great. I know you’ll enjoy it. Great storyline an nd well-developed characters.
I’m terrible at titles, but I have to say that it’s remarkable that we’ve come to consider Fitzwilliam as an attractive first name for Darcy. After all, it’s not as if the world is full of young Fitzwilliams, yet Darcy can overcome even that impediment and make it lovable.
LOL, Abigail! You’re right. When I first heard the name Fitzwilliam at age 14, I did wonder who on earth would name their son something like that — it was pretty far from the typical WI teen names (like Mike, Steve and Craig) that I was familiar with… But I figured it was just a British thing.
Fitzwilliam is acceptable because it is Mr. Darcy’s name. Period. We see past it. But I do confess it is a bit weird to me, which is why I chose to shorten it to “William” when he is among family. I couldn’t wrap my head around it at first.
LOL, Sharon! We do make allowances for our dear Mr. Darcy, don’t we?
I totally agree with Sharon. Darcy could carry off any first name. But I do think the formality of it combined with it’s connection to his family heritage perfectly suits the character.
Bonnie, you bring up a great point about the formality of the name. It *does* suit him in that way, in addition to the family connection
.
I often agonize over titles for my stories, knowing when something is not right, but not knowing how to make it better. I usually don’t name them until near the end – except if the title is the inspiration for a story.
I have found that when in doubt, Shakespeare often provides the perfect title.
Carolyn, you’ve nailed it — Shakespeare is one of my favorite places to search for book-related inspiration (titles, names, quotes characters will say…), as well as song lyrics, of course!
This is such good timing, because I am in the middle of re-titling my book! This post was great inspiration, and I loved all the little tidbits of info, both in the post and in all the wonderful comments.
Caryn, I am anxiously awaiting hearing more about your book, including the new title!! Sending you a big hug and lots of good luck.
Wow! I am always impressed at what you authors go through to publish wonderful novels! Thanks for all the hard work (and all those title changes)!
Jakki, thank YOU! It’s more than worth all the hours spent and the hard work if, at the end, enthusiastic and appreciative readers await! You and the other wonderful readers who pick up our books are why we do this and why we love our job so much
.
Hi, Marilyn! I think if I thought any harder about names for my characters and books, I’d cause serious brain damage.
It’s so tough for me, so it was nice to hear it’s tough for you too. Thanks for sharing! BTW, I love all your titles – right away they invoke something in me that makes me want to read them.
Oh, Robin, it’s definitely tough for me, too!! I know one NYT bestselling author who has gotten to keep most — if not all — of her own titles, and she’s published nearly 100 books!! I’ll be lucky to hit it right with 1 out of 10! Fingers crossed that I’ll get to see one of your books on the shelves soon, even if you didn’t think up the title for it…
I must say that I prefer most of the first issue titles chosen by the author, rather than the publisher changed names. (Although that doesn’t keep me from adding them to my collection!)
Becky, I have no doubt MANY authors (including me) would enthusiastically agree with you!
I love Kara Louise’s original title Something Like Regret because it reminds me of the passage when Lizzy Bennet visits Pemberley with her uncle and aunt.
I don’t agree with publishers renaming AuAu self-published books into titles that must include Darcy. Why can’t it be printed with the original titles that authors first named it? I understand it is for marketability purpose but it’s kind of frustrating to remember the plot if there’s an overdose of Darcy everywhere. I’m talking especially of Abigail Reynolds’ Pemberley Variation series.
Btw, I think North & South should have a name change for those unfamiliar with Victorian classics. Before knowing it is about the industrialisation of Great Britain, I thought it was about the American Civil War between the Yankees and Confederates. It had me confused then.
Can we rename it The Great Divide?
John Jakes wrote North & South about the American Civil War. It’s a great book. But l always found a lot of similarities between the basic cultural, political, social, and economic problems between the two. In both cases, the Northern industrialist/capitalist/progressive culture clashes with an agrarian/classist/traditional culture. A lot of the problems were similar, but the ugliness of slavery marred the Southern view in America.
Marilyn, I rather like the name Thistle Park, but you’re right – not for Mr. Darcy’s Pemberley. When I first wrote my book, it’s working title was not Affinity and Affection, but something else entirely. As a matter of fact, I can’t even recall what it was, lol! Sourcebooks changed it to The Truth About Mr. Darcy when they acquired the rights to it, but I still think that A&A was a much more fitting title. I honestly don’t approve of putting Darcy’s name in every single P&P title out there on the market. Sure, it may spell it out right away, but our readers are both intelligent and savvy. They can spot a P&P variation when they see one.
Best,
Susan
GAH! I cannot BELIEVE I used an apostrophe in its! I’ve had two little girls for days on end and haven’t gotten a lick of work done in about two weeks. Can you tell my brain is on siesta?