Rules are meant to be broken

 

Taped to my monitor is a slip of paper with a quotation attributed to Winston Churchill:

 

Ending a sentence with a preposition

is something up with which I will not put.

 

There are several different versions of that quote – one with the word ‘something’ replaced by ‘bloody nonsense’ and another using ‘errant pedantry‘.  It’s questionable whether Churchill ever wrote any variation of such words in response to an editor’s amendment; but, no matter its origin, the sentiment always makes me smile.  It also incites me to shamelessly end sentences in a manner I’m not supposed to.

 

Over the years, I’ve cruelly mutilated countless innocent sentences in an attempt to avoid breaking that odious grammar commandment “Thou shalt not end a sentence with a preposition”.  I confess errant pedantry is bloody nonsense I have been guilty of.  No more, I say!  Honestly, I’d much rather write like Jane Austen.

 

“If I can but see one of my daughters happily settled at Netherfield,” said Mrs. Bennet to her husband, “and all the others equally well married, I shall have nothing to wish for.”

According to Professor Kathryn Sutherland,

… in Austen’s case, we discover a powerful counter-grammatical way of writing. She broke most of the rules for writing good English.

 

Oh, yes, if I can but happily settle into a powerful counter-grammatical way of writing, I shall have nothing for which to wish for.

 

Several years ago, a tongue-in-cheek set of rules for writing good English made its way around the internet.  Since you’re probably already familiar with most of those tips, let’s just review a few here … particularly the ones I take delight in ignoring.

 

GRAMMAR RULES!

 

Always avoid annoying alliteration.

If you avidly agree, I ardently advocate avoidance of Mr. Darcy Takes the Plunge.

 

Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.

While composing narration (from Mr. Darcy’s point of view) for A Little Whimsical in His Civilities, I investigated excessively for utterances containing interminable syllables.

 

Eliminate quotations. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said, “I hate quotations. Tell me what you know.

Let’s see.  So far in this blog post I’ve quoted Churchill, Austen, Sutherland, and Emerson.

 

Eradicate excessive exclamation marks!!!

Oh!  I simply must quote Austen again!

 

“Good gracious!  Lord bless me!  only think!  dear me!  Mr. Darcy!  Who would have thought it!  And is it really true?  Oh my sweetest Lizzy!  how rich and how great you will be!  What pin-money, what jewels, what carriages you will have!  Jane’s is nothing to it – nothing at all.  I am so pleased – so happy.  Such a charming man! – so handsome! so tall! – Oh, my dear Lizzy! …”

 

(It is a truth universally acknowledged that excuses and exceptions can be made for an excess of exclamation marks when executing Mrs. Bennet’s effusions.)

 

And don’t start a sentence with a conjunction.

But, but  … Austen did!  And I quote:

 

And his behaviour, so strikingly altered – what could it mean?

 

When dangling, watch your participles.

Misplacing one’s modifiers and dangling one’s participles can be rather entertaining.

For example:

Lydia danced with Mr. Wickham wearing her sprigged muslin gown.

Daintily prancing, Colonel Fitzwilliam brought his horse to a halt.

Mr. Darcy left Hunsford smouldering and fuming.

 

Puns are for children, not groan readers.

Well, obviously, I should be severely punished!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Stop right there, ma’am!”

 

Who are you?


“I am an officer of the Grammar Police Force, and I am here to serve and correct.”

 

Oh, golly, the Grammar Police Force!  Well, metaphors be with you, officer.  Look, I realize I’m guilty of breaking a few little ol’ rules of English grammar.  And, come to think of it, I am also guilty of the indirect boast – for I am quite aware of my defects in writing. But will it be necessary to sentence me?

 

“J. Marie Croft, as you know, puns are the lowest form of humour; and your lack of good grammar makes me [sic].  I’ve read some of your Austen-inspired work.  You have repeatedly committed the crime of playing with words.  In addition, you do not always abide by rules of syntax, morphology, phonology and semantics.”

 

The rules of wha … huh?  Sin tax?  Am I to pay a fine for my transgressions?

 

“Ma’am, I begin to seriously wonder whether you even know the Queen’s English.”

 

Well, duh.  Of course, I know she is!  I mean, really, what kind of nitwit do you take me for?

 

“Speaking of taking you, come with me, ma’am.  Amongst other things, we’ll discuss what you’re guilty of.”

 

Good heavens, officer, I do believe you just prepositioned me!!!

Please leave a comment.

And feel free to dangle your participles!


24 Responses to Rules are meant to be broken

  • As always, your post made me laugh, Joanne! It reminds me of various times in my publishing experience when I’ve received copyedits that change passages that are direct quotations from Jane Austen. And, of course, the many times I have been taken to task for starting a sentence with a conjunction. ;)

  • Sharon Lathan says:

    Love it!! Immensely, ardently, enthusiastically adore and delight in this glittering accumulation of sentences!

    I have an article I discovered a while back titled “In defense of purple prose” which I should share. It definitely eased my mind a bit and I still read it from time to time. Just to assure me that not all descriptive adjectives and adverbs are creations of the devil! As I have often said, thank goodness writers are brave enough to take chances and actually write as they feel fits their unique voice and style of storytelling. If not then every book would be the same!

    Well done, dear Joanne. Thanks for this!

  • Oh Joanne! You found me out! I’m truly gulty of using excessive exclamation points! Especially early in the morning. Hmm, I wonder what that means. Thank you for a wonderful and in my case very timely post. (I’m going though copy edits-grrrr!)

  • Joanne, I can’t help it – I just like exclamation points, so Grammar Police and all their rules be darned! As a matter of fact, I feel inspired to quote the distinguished and eloquent Sheriff Rosco P. Coultrane from the Dukes of Hazard, who often said, “Cuff ‘em and stuff ‘em, Enos!” (Lol. Bet you weren’t expecting THAT quote, were you?! Obviously, I’m in rare form this morning, but I hope to come to my senses shortly, after I have a hot shower and ingest ample amounts of caffeine.)

    As usual, your post brought a big, fat smile to my face, and made me want to be silly – very silly – so thank you! :)

    Best,
    Susan

  • Thanks for getting into the spirit, ladies!

    Abigail, quite often when I used an Austen quotation, the editor said, “This doesn’t make sense.”

    Sharon, please do share “In defense of purple prose”. You are so right … we should each be allowed to use our unique voices.

    Heather, shame on you for using excessive exclamation marks! Now, get back to work! I am so looking forward to reading FD Rock Star!!!

    Susan, “silly” is not the half of it! Good grief, Dukes of Hazard, indeed! Go shower and mug up!

    Now I’m off to work for the day. I’ll check in again this evening.
    Have a great day, everyone!
    Joanne

  • Cindy Jones says:

    Well done, Joanne! Thank you for a delightful post to start my day. I imagine the wheels turning in your head, and bet you are a source of merriment at home and office!

  • Jakki L says:

    Lock me up! I am guilty as charged for my ardent adoration of annoying alliteration! And let us not forget my penchant for excessive use of exclamation points!! I feel very much like Mrs. Bennet in that regard!! (Oh dear)! Love the post Joanne!! :mrgreen: This was a great way to begin my day! I am very much looking forward to reading Mr. Darcy takes a Plunge and delve into your world of wit and puns! :grin:

  • Carolyn Eberhart says:

    ?/i?
    Very funny! It cured my migraine (that’s hyperbole)!

    It reminds me of something that happened a week or so ago. My boss asked my to go over a report for her. I returned it with the adverbs crossed out. I told her adverbs were considered “out”.

    “But why?” she asked, “I like adverbs.”

    I explained about word counts and streamlining but had to admit that I like adverbs to. In fact, I some times want to start singing “Lolly, Lolly, Lolly, Get Your Adverbs Here!” whenever someone says get rid of the adverbs. (That includes myself!)

    Lyrics to Lolly so you see why it “positively, very, very, necessary” to use adverbs
    http://www.schoolhouserock.tv/Lolly.html

  • C. Allyn Pierson says:

    Split infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions are outdated notions perpetuated by elderly English teachers. I recommend that you all read Martha Brockenbrough’s “Things that make us [Sic]” It not only discusses grammar rules and the clear usage of English, it is really funny (I laughed so many times out loud reading it in bed that I had to leave the room so my husband could sleep). :lol: Besides, I think all rules are off when writing dialogue- I mean, really, how many of us think in grammatically correct sentences? And… numerous exclamation points are entirely apt when Mrs. Bennet is speaking! :grin:

  • Kathryn L. Nelson says:

    What fun, Joanne! I’m enthralled with diminutive words! And exclamation points??? Love them almost as much as question marks!!!

  • I’ve worked as the grammar police for 12 years, and I’ve always believed that there’s a difference in formal and informal writing. Certain rules must be followed in scholarly works, but they can be let slide in novels. But (see I broke one) I am going to have to stand firm on the exclamation points and question marks rule. If you have an exclamation point at the end of every sentence, it becomes meaningless, or if you pile four question marks at the end of a sentence, does it become more of a question? (?????) :roll: So don’t ask me to edit your book if you like to break this one! (!!!) :wink:

  • Mary Simonsen says:

    Oh, how funny! I agree with Carey. So many rules are out of date or never made sense in the first place (as in splitting infinitives). I hate “whom” and have written many a sentence to avoid using “whom.” It sounds sinister. “For whom the bell tolls.” As usual, I enjoyed your post. :lol:

    P.S. I love emoticons.

  • Kara Louise says:

    What a fun, true, and revealing post!! I must confess I am guilty! Thanks for making me laugh!

  • RivkaBelle says:

    Oh my word! I’m literally gasping. :lol: Exceptionally educated in English execution, I do believe your writing is.

  • Colleen L says:

    How you ladies keep all these writing ‘rules’ straight I’ll never understand. I think that fiction writing is more about getting the feeling of the story. If one focuses too hard on getting their work to mold to all the writing ‘rules’ often the writing feels too forced and loses the ability to pull the reader in and enjoy the story.

    Instead of ‘rules’…. I think of them more as guideline. …. Except for the overuse or forgetten comma (misuse of the comma is more annoying that too many exclamations)!

    Thanks AuAu… Keep up the good work

  • C. Allyn Pierson says:

    Mary: thank heavens the grammar police did not have emoticons to make rules about- we can use them however we want! :twisted:

  • C. Allyn Pierson says:

    The rule I hate the most is not splitting infinitives. I think it sound better to say “to quiet go” then “to go quietly” if my emphasis is on the “quiet”, but the editors at Sourcebooks made me change all my split infinitives and I didn’t think it worth fighting about (especially as it was the first book of mine they were publishing!)

  • Lisa S says:

    I’m with Carey (and Mary). So many of the rules are out of date and meaningless — and I especially like splitting infinitives. It’s my favorite thing to to do — to boldly go where all writers have gone before. ;) I also love my exclamation points!! I use them often. In fact, I do find myself on occasion having to remove them from things I have written because I have used them on almost every sentence. Teeheehee.

    Thank you for the post and the laugh. I really enjoyed both!

  • JoanneMM says:

    oh this is just brilliant!! i can’t stop laughing Joanne :lol: what a spectacular post!
    i just started reading “Mr. Darcy Takes the Plunge” and it is so enjoyable!! I love stories that are just so playful and happy and the humor is spectacular! I really enjoy the puns and all. Thanks for the book and the post :mrgreen:

  • LilMissMolly says:

    OMG, this post is just too funny. I’m trying to get my 2 high school daughters to take note of proper grammar rules and they just ignore me. I truly believe that texting has put an end to good grammar. :roll:

  • Just catching up with AuAu – so glad I did! Hilarious, Joanne, my participles are all a-dangling!

  • This!!! was absolutely brilliant!!! You are the finest humourist of the age, as Jane rather improbably told Cassandra.

  • Kat says:

    Hilarious!!! And so cleverly presented !!! (I’m a fan of those exclamation marks!!! – hehe). I envy those of you that actually understand those rules – I’m part of a genertion that the government decided to forgo teaching grammar to… Thanks for making me laugh.

Our Novels

*Giveaways

Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page
.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.

P&P200

Our "real time" behind-the-scenes story of the events in
Pride & Prejudice
is ongoing. To read all the portions in order visit The Writers Block or click the image above.

Contact Us

Authors can be contacted via their email link on the Austen Authors page. For general information or to contact the admins, click the image to the left.

Archive

Categories

May 14

Shannon Winslow
debuts! 

GIVEAWAYS 

May 20

Guest: Amy Smith

GIVEAWAY

June 4

Marsha Altman
release party!

GIVEAWAY

June 7

Colette Saucier debuts!

June 11

Regina Jeffers
release party!

GIVEAWAY 

Visitors