The Better Mash-Up: An Exoneration of a New Literary Genre – Part I

by Vera Nazarian

If you’ve ever been in the San Francisco Bay Area in California and driven by car, chances are you’ve driven past a small town called Gilroy, home of the Gilroy Garlic Festival, and also known as “the garlic capital of the world.”
The aroma is amazing. Miles before you’re within city limits, you smell garlic. Tasty, yummy, overpowering—but never annoying. 
It tempts you to stop and grab a bite of something, and acts like the perfect seduction tourist trap. Indeed, garlic is cultivated and grown here, and they put it in everything—including ice cream.
Garlic ice cream, you say? Woah!
I’ve personally never had the chance to taste it, but I am told it’s perfectly delicious.
How can ice cream and garlic ever mix together into something palatable? Isn’t that bizarre and impossible? 
Photo by Rüdiger Wölk
Well, then there is chocolate. And peanut butter. And we all know what happens when you put the two together! More realistic to mix these two?
What about sweet and sour beef? Marinated meat? Or sweetmeat? Whoever thought of sweetening meat?
There are plenty more examples. In fact, most of the world’s culinary history revolves around accidental combinations of rather disparate ingredients. People make accidental discoveries of wonderful dishes by dropping one thing into anther or spilling a bit on one liquid into another.
Sometimes (frequently) it turns out awful. At other times it takes several tries, with ingredients mixed in different proportions, to get it right. But with time and much trial and error, you get a marvelous new product!
Photo by Lotus Head
 
What does any of this have to do with literary mash-ups?
Well, mash-ups are exactly the same thing—human attempts to combine two or more very unrelated literary ingredients into one rather marvelous new whole. Multiple styles, storylines, mores, tones, moods—and yes, genres—are mixed together, in varying proportions and, with enough trial and error, something magical and new happens…
A new literary flavor is born! 
The mash-up genre has been around under different guises for centuries. Stage drama started out in places such as Ancient Greece as a combination of religious ritual and popular entertainment. Talk about putting together two unlikely companions!
However, in its modern re-emergence, the literary mash-up has really taken off a few years ago, since Quirk Books released the phenomenally popular Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith. Part of its initial draw—its compelling power—can be attributed to everyone simply being stunned and curious to imagine such a thing, really a big joke.
It’s the global shock of combining two very disparate flavors of entertainment—the “proper and genteel” chick lit historical romance and the “rude and crude” macho violence and bloody monster gore of zombies (the popularity of which is in part an outgrowth of “first person shooter” video games that are always in need of some basic enemy splatter material—and zombies are the perfect dumb monster).
P&P&Z is a fun gargantuan romp, written by a man (and it is unclear if the author is a particular fan of Austen or not) and as heartily entertaining as a single rude joke often is. It is completely irreverent, “in your face,” and makes no particular attempt to stay within the style of the original classic (nor is that the point of the joke). It does not adhere to the spirit of Austen, but boldly puts the characters and plot smack into the dizzy madness of a zombie apocalypse. Nothing remains of the original subtlety; any woeful remnants of “nuance” are clobbered over the head with bloody zombie guts.
This is the literary equivalent of a crude smelly frat boy crashing a formal garden party, stomping on the fine china, and giving a drooling kiss to the debutante.
An act of rampage driven by the need to “despoil.”
(Or, to put it in culinary terms, it’s like throwing large chunks of one ingredient into a batter, and never really mixing it properly, ignoring all sense of homogeneity in favor of blunt contrast, and the weird flavor factor.)
The reader either hates it instantly or gets a huge kick out of it; laughs at the crazy situations, wacky fine illustrations; possibly never quite reads the novel in its entirety but dips into it for an occasional laugh, and gives the book as a gag gift for the holidays.
And the literary purists? The die-hard fans of the original classic that has been thus mangled? They are naturally disgusted, upset, and often furious.
True Janeites boycott and disdain the first popular mash-up and its many successors and imitators (from a variety of publishers both big and small, written by different authors with a phenomenally wide range of skills and dedication). All right—maybe they crack it open in a discreet bookstore aisle (after all, this is a riff on their beloved Jane, and the pull of “all things Austen” is hard to resist), and then giggle painfully (and very much in private), and quickly put the book back on the shelf, to dissociate themselves from such derogatory “literary product.”
But—how accurate, and how fair really, is such a response?
You might be surprised to find out, next time!
(Continued next month in Part Two.)

Another Jane – a Review of Jane Eyre by Diana Birchall

There have been at least 18 filmed versions of Jane Eyre, and I’m happy to confirm that this latest version ranks very high and thoroughly deserves its great reviews.  It is an artful film that isn’t unbalanced in any way, and which inhabits the mid-19th century to perfection.  Filmed mostly in Derbyshire, with rugged old Haddon Hall standing in for Thornfield, the visual setting is more true to the atmosphere and period than any other Jane Eyre I can remember.  The moor is one of the stars of the picture, and the sense of isolation, of nearly uninhabited desolate country, is beautifully conveyed, reflecting on the restricted lives people lived in the midst of these miles of wildness. Costumes, interiors, add to the verisimilitude:  Jane’s gowns look hand made in their plainness, and for all Thornfield’s massiveness, its decor is austere, and the sense that light only comes from the vast gray sky by day firelight at night, also takes us back in time.
The story is not a straightforward literal retelling, but artful director Cary Fukanaga and screenwriter Moira Buffini use a sort of circular structure, opening with Jane’s running from Thornfield and finding refuge with the Rivers family, and then working forward to that point again. It’s very dramatically effective, and brings sometimes overlooked aspects of the story into notice, in a way that refreshes the narrative. Yet, purists will be relieved that the plot does not fail to hit the essential notes, and familiar beloved scenes receive their homage. Those of us who are as attached to our Jane Eyre as we are to our Jane Austen (any hands?) will have the happiness of a few plot nits to pick.  I won’t pick them here (it doesn’t really matter, for instance, that the movie’s Rochester doesn’t lose his hand, as the book’s one did, or that we never find out what happens to Adele in the fire), but one line did make me flinch, it seemed as awful as the scene in Emma when she is rude to Miss Bates:  I refer to the moment when Mr. Rochester says that he has no use for “simple minded old ladies” – in Mrs. Fairfax’s hearing!  How unthinkable!  This does not and could not happen in the book.  But it was a rare sour note.
Now for the actors!  The principals, Mia Wasikowska as Jane and Michael Fassbender as Mr. Rochester, are good.  They are, especially Ms. Wasikowska, who looks little and plain (but not too plain) and portrays just the right mixture of honesty and delicate grit, though she is arguably slightly less successful at rising to the proper level of suppressed intense passion.  With the casting of Mr. Fassbender I am not satisfied.  He is too young and pretty, and his acting just too small scale to qualify him as a great Rochester. Mind you, there have been some truly spectacularly awful Rochesters, and he is not one of those.  Still, anyone who has seen Timothy Dalton…Well, comparisons are odious. Suffice it to say that Wasikowska and Fassbender turn in more than respectable performances, but it is a telling fact that the show is completely stolen by Dame Judi Dench in the comparatively minor part of the housekeeper, Mrs. Fairfax. 
  
Now, however much you enjoy it, you have to admit that a Jane Eyre where Mrs. Fairfax is the fascinating spirit that warms and animates the piece, has something about it that’s not quite right!  Still, let other pens cavil; I only adjure you to go and see this Jane Eyre.  It’s lovely and admirable but not beyond criticism, which makes it all the more enjoyable.

Interview with Deborah Moggach

Deborah Moggach was the primary screenwriter of the masterful Golden Globe and BAFTA nominated Joe Wright directed 2005 version of Pride & Prejudice. Adam Spunberg, famed co-conspirator of the Austen Twitter Project with our own Lynn Shepherd – Murder at Mansfield Park – scored a major coup in sitting down with Deborah for an extensive interview.
That interview aired in two parts on the online magazine Picktainment.  I love Adam’s introduction:

Pride & Prejudice might very well be the most beloved novel in the history of the English language, so imagine how challenging it must be to apply a modern fingerprint to Jane Austen’s revered, two-century-old text without tainting the parchment. And by the way, not only is the task to metamorphose her work into a screenplay, but to condense it all into two hours, potentially earning the ire of Austen devotees worldwide and the lady herself, from the grave.

That was what Deborah Moggach set out to do when writing the script for Keira Knightley and company in the 2005 Pride & Prejudice, directed by Joe Wright. There were some who thought it impossible, but Ms. Moggach proceeded to dazzle audiences with a brilliant script, vaulting herself into the pantheon of all-time great adapters of classic novels.

I was fortunate enough to interview her this week for Picktainment, a delightful encounter in which I found her to be every bit the Austen heroine, minus any traces of pride – or prejudice.

It is a wonderful article. Here are the links to each part. Thanks, Adam, for continuing to share your enthusiasm for Jane Austen with us. And for the record, I don’t agree with her about the American ending either!

Scripting Pride & Prejudice with Deborah Moggach: Part I

Scripting Pride & Prejudice with Deborah Moggach: Part II

Party with Sharon!

Once upon a time a clueless woman sat down at her computer and decided to type the lines of a story that were racing unrelentingly through her brain. Upon completion of that short story deemed adequate enough to be read by others she posted it on a fan fiction website. Feedback was positive so she continued on with transcribing her crazy ideas onto indelible computer paper and one thing lead to another as they say until lo and behold she eventually ended up with a publisher, an editor, and five novels to her name! 
The moral of the story?

I have no idea! Obviously I am that woman and am still largely clueless! Whatever the case, I’ll accept it and happily celebrate the launch of The Trouble With Mr. Darcy – Volume Five of The Darcy Saga series.

Even charmed lives will encounter troubles along the way….

After a time of happiness and strife, Darcy and Elizabeth gather with family and friends in Hertfordshire to celebrate the wedding of Kitty Bennet. Georgiana Darcy returns from a lengthy tour of the Continent with happy secrets to share, accompanied by the newlywed Colonel Fitzwilliam and Lady Simone, who may have secrets of their own. The stage is set for joy until the party is upset by the arrival of the long absent Mr. and Mrs. Wickham.

Wickham’s jealousy and resentment of Darcy has grown steadily throughout the years and Darcy rightly suspects that Wickham is up to no good. Darcy enlists the aid of Colonel Fitzwilliam to keep an eye on Wickham’s activity, but neither anticipate the extreme measures taken to exact his revenge. Nor do they fathom the layers of deception and persons involved in the scheme.

George Wickham returns to Hertfordshire bent on creating trouble, and Elizabeth and her son are thrown into danger. Knowing that Wickham has nothing left to lose, Darcy and Fitzwilliam rush to the rescue in a race against time.  This lushly romantic story takes a turn for the swashbuckling when Mr. Darcy has to confront the villainous Wickham and his own demons at the same time… devoted as he is, what battles within will Mr. Darcy have to face?

Intrigued? I do hope so! But how did the story evolve to this place? What came first?

Mr. and Mrs. Fitzwilliam Darcy ~
Beginning on their wedding day, Darcy and Elizabeth are two people who are deeply in love with one another and are excited to begin their marriage.  Their courtship was tempestuous; misunderstandings and misgivings nearly tore them apart. But now that they’ve seen each other without prejudice, their trust, attraction, and delight in each other grows with every passing day. Both are inexperienced and innocent, sharing moments of shyness and boldness as they discover the kinds of intimacies that a newlywed couple shares.  As their love story unfolds, they reveal their innermost secrets and feelings, embracing each other in a marriage filled with romance, passion, humor, and drama that will keep you spellbound.

Loving Mr. Darcy ~
Darcy and Lizzy venture away from Pemberley to journey through England, finding friends, relatives, fun, love, and an even deeper and more sacred bond along the way.  Having embarked on the greatest adventure of all, marriage and the start of a new life together, now the Darcys take the reader on a journey through a time of prosperity, enjoyment, and security. They experience all the adventures of travel, with friends and relatives providing both companionship and complications, and with fun as their focus.  


The sights and sounds, tastes and flavors of Regency England come alive. Through it all, Darcy and Lizzy continue to build a marriage filled with romance, sensuality, and the beauty of a deep, abiding love.

My Dearest Mr. Darcy ~
Darcy is more deeply in love with his wife than ever. As the golden summer draws to a close and the Darcys look ahead to the end of their first year of marriage, Mr. Darcy could never have imagined his love could grow even deeper with the passage of time.  Lizzy is full of surprises. She is unpredictable and lively, pulling Darcy out of his stern and serious demeanor with her teasing and temptation. Looking ahead and planning for celebrations and life events large and small, Lizzy can still catch Darcy unawares when he least expects it.  But surprising events force the Darcys to weather absence and illness, and to discover whether they can find a way to build a bond of everlasting love and desire.   The romance and bewitchment is never-ending…

In The Arms of Mr. Darcy ~
Darcy and Elizabeth are as much in love as ever—even more so as their relationship matures. Their passion inspires everyone around them, and as winter turns to spring, romance finds nearly everyone.  Confirmed bachelor Richard Fitzwilliam sets his sights on a seemingly unattainable, beautiful widow, Georgiana Darcy learns to flirt outrageously, the flighty Kitty Bennet develops her first crush, and Caroline Bingley meets her match.  But the path of true love never does run smooth, and Elizabeth and Darcy are kept busy navigating their friends and loved ones through the inevitable separations, misunderstandings, misgivings and lovers’ quarrels…

So now I am up to #5 and thrilled to be here on Austen Authors amongst this fine group of writers and amazing readers sharing my accomplishment and happiness. Is there anywhere else on the web better than Austen Authors to express love of Jane-related literature? I think not! In honor of my release and joy in being a part of this amazing collective, I will be giving away 2 signed copies of The Trouble With Mr. Darcy!  Simply leave a comment to be entered into the drawing, which I will conclude at midnight on Friday, April 8. Check back over the weekend to see if you won!

 At the same time I am hosting an extravaganza with fun and games over on my website – Sharon Lathan, Novelist. I am giving away even MORE copies of my novel – also signed – so come on over. Plus, the virtual book tour has begun with giveaways galore at those websites. WOW!

Let the confetti fly and balloons soar! Talk to me about the Darcys and happily-ever-after since apparently that is a subject I never tire of.

Abigail’s Double Launch!

by Abigail Reynolds

By now you’ve heard many Austen Authors say that launching a book is like having a baby. In that case, I’m giving birth to twins! This was scheduled long ago as the launch for What Would Mr. Darcy Do?, now in bookstores everywhere (I love saying that!), but with my typical lack of planning, it turns out that my new self-pubbed book, A Pemberley Medley, is being rolled out this week as well. It wasn’t quite what I had planned, but then again, don’t most mothers of twins say that?
It’s much like having newborn twins, too. I’m dazed and happy and confused and I don’t know which way is up. No sooner do I get one book fed and cleaned up (or writer three guest blogs, or whatever), then the other starts screaming for attention. I had lots of plans for what I would do on April 1, the official release date for What Would Mr. Darcy Do?, and I got none of it done because the ebook of A Pemberley Medley ended up being released early – and discovered immediately by very diligent readers! – and I had to spend the day trouble-shooting it. It’s fortunate that I thrive on this kind of chaos.

So, enough about me and onto the books! A Pemberley Medley is a book of short Pride & Prejudice variations, including new material as well as some stories that have appeared in different places on line. One of the most exciting bits about it for me is that I included a favorite excerpt from my never-to-be-published book, The Rule of Reason, which has some overlap with one of my published books, Impulse & Initiative/To Conquer Mr. Darcy. Most of it, though, is different, and includes a couple of my very favorite scenes of all time. I’ve always regretted being unable to add those to my published work, so I’m delighted to have turned one into an excerpt for A Pemberley Medley! This new book will eventually be available at all online booksellers in both print and ebook format, but it’s still being rolled out. The ebook is available now for Kindle at Amazon and for all other e-readers, including Nook, at Smashwords. The print version is on available on Amazon now, but other retailers may take a few weeks to catalog it, so please be patient!

What Would Mr. Darcy Do? is a reissue of my early work From Lambton to Longbourn with a new opening scene and some minor editing. Many people call it their favorite of my books. It’s a variation beginning at the Lambton Inn after Elizabeth receives Jane’s letters. Have you ever read that scene and wanted to scream when Darcy leaves without telling Elizabeth how he feels? That’s how I started in this whole business of writing variations. One day I was re-reading that scene in P&P and began yelling at Darcy to stop, but no matter what I said to him, he kept leaving the room with a long, serious look, and finally I had to take matters into my own hands. The Lambton Inn scene in What Would Mr. Darcy Do? has a very different and more satisfying ending. It’s a fun, happy book with lots of longing and romantic feelings, but no angst. It’s ultimate comfort food.

One problem with having newborn twins is that the older children start to feel neglected and act up. In this case, the problem child is The Rule of Reason. As people have read the excerpt, they’ve wanted to read the entire novel, which is available at Lulu.com. Since they’d already bought A Pemberley Medley, I decided it was only fair to slash the price on the ebook of The Rule of Reason to $1.99. For those of you who are scratching your heads because I just said it was unpublished and now I’m saying that you can buy it, it’s one of those odd definition things. It’ll never be available in bookstores, even by special order, or online booksellers except Lulu, and it doesn’t have an ISBN. Essentially, it’s the child that I hid in the attic, so it’s no surprise it’s feeling neglected!

Now the good stuff: the giveaways. I’ll be giving away a signed copy of What Would Mr. Darcy Do? plus two e-book copies of A Pemberley Medley to randomly selected commenters on this post. So please celebrate with me by posting a comment for a chance to win a book!

March Fortnight Quiz 2 – Answers and Winner

The second of our March fortnight quizzes was a hotly contested match, but our eventual winner managed a perfect score on questions based on our November 2010 posts. Below is a review of the questions, along with the correct responses.

  1. Who drew “Mr. Darcy” in the Carolyn Eberhart post? Robert Bell   Who drew “Scrooge”?  John Leech

  2. What is the date of Mr. Gardiner’s express in Pride and Prejudice? August 2
  3. Who created the images which graced Mary Simonsen’s Thanksgiving Day post? Jane C. Nylander
  4. Which Austen-related actor has a birthday on November 7? Lindsay Duncan  On November 10? Hugh Bonneville
  5. Who was the leader of the Picts? Angus McFergus
  6. What does the term “post Captain” mean? The officer had held the rank of captain for a full two years.
  7. What was Ambrose Bierce’s definition of a “turkey” according to “The Devil’s Dictionary”? a large bird whose flesh, when eaten on certain religious anniversaries, has the peculiar property of attesting piety and gratitude
  8. Which character did the 1987 Northanger Abbey adaptation add as a confidant to General Tilney? Marchioness de Thierry
  9. According to Kara Louise what should be the bumper sticker for Edward Ferras? Beware of promises made in our youth.
  10. Which Jane Austen literary fiction is generally acknowledged to have started the “adaptation” craze? Sybil Brinton’s 1913 Old Friends and New Fancies: An Imaginary Sequel to the Novels of Jane Austen
  11. “Plucking the Turkey” was created by whom? Henry Walton
  12. When was the University of St. Andrews founded? 1413
  13. Who is the author of Tom Jones? Henry Fielding
  14. What was the tattoo for the morose, heart-broken Benwick? Fanny Forever (crossed out and followed by) Louisa Forever
  15. What is the title of the Persuasion inspired book by Abigail Reynolds? Morning Light
  16. What was the original meaning of the French word “fiance” and when did it come into use in England? “trust” (later “to promise,” especially “to marry”) – circa 1835
  17. Which Austen Author is a fencing pro? Carolyn Eberhart
  18. Who is the author of The Rebels of Ireland? Edward Rutherford
The winner of March Fortnight Quiz 2 is Luthien 84. Please contact Regina at contests@austenauthors.com to claim your prize of a hardcover copy of Sense and Sensibility, along with a Jane Austen bookmark, being donated by J. Marie Croft.

March Giveaways – Winners Announced

We, at Austen Authors, are proud to announce the winners of our March Giveaways. Those listed below should contact Regina at

contests@austenauthors.com to claim your prize. Be sure to leave your shipping information. To each of our winners we wish a hearty congratulations!
an autographed copy of To Conquer Mr. Darcy (donated by Abigail Reynolds) – Jakki L.
an unsigned copy of Only Mr. Darcy Will Do by Kara Louise (donated by Sourcebooks) Joanne MM
an autographed copy of Mr. and Mrs. Fitzwilliam Darcy (donated by Sharon Lathan) Melissa A
a 2005 Pride and Prejudice DVD (donated by Jack Caldwell) – pianobarb
a box of “Green” Truffles (mint, chocolate mint, lime, pistachio) (donated by Carolyn Eberhart – Becky C
an autographed copy of My Jane Austen Summer plus Lily Berry’s Pink Rose tea from Bingley’s Tea (donated by Cindy Jones) – April D

Planning With Passion

by Susan Kaye
I can listen no longer in silence … I must speak to you … you pierce my soul …I am half agony, half hope … tell me not I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone forever … I offer myself to you … I have loved none but you … ” These are some of the declarations of love offered to Anne Elliot by Frederick Wentworth in Jane Austen’s last published novel, Persuasion.

Most of the letters in Jane Austen’s novels were utilitarian in nature. I suppose, depending on how you view romance, the next most romantic note in the Austen world is to Mrs Forrester from Lydia Bennett, telling of her madcap run for the boarder with George Wickham. Nah, that doesn’t even get in the ballpark.

Anyway, The Letter is quite popular. You can join over 1100 others on a Facebook page dedicated to Captain Frederick Wentworth’s letter to Anne Elliot (Persuasion). You can go HERE and read about a successful, very public marriage proposal composed almost entirely of Wentworth’s letter, and other love letters between real people. There is also an enterprising soul from Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, who, on Etsy, was selling 4 X 5 inch mini pillows/sachets with the letter printed on the face. (They are sold out as far as I can tell.) I myself did a give away and as a bonus hand-stitched a bookmark with “half agony, half hope” cross-stitched with on it. (I’ll be doing something similar for the winner of one of this month’s Fortnight Quizzes here on Austen Authors.) There is something about The Letter that draws us in.

Certainly the passion is obvious. Even without reading Persuasion, you feel the urgency and know the man writing this letter fears greatly losing this woman, and that pulling out all the stops is his only hope. As Admiral Lord Nelson was heard to say, “Never mind the manoeuvres, go straight at them.” Most people love passion and that is why we read romance, I believe. Most of us have our own stories of passion and we like to relive them through the characters in books.

Last week, my husband and I celebrated 33 years of marriage. Our custom has been to celebrate at the Oregon coast in January. It’s nearly deserted at that time of year and the rates are dirt-cheap. The economy got in the way of custom this year, and work got in the way of Hubby even taking the day off, so it was not the anniversary I had hoped for. After three decades I’ve learned to be a little bit flexible because there will be other days to celebrate. As I had time on my hands, I got to thinking about the letter. I still love the passion, but I have come to appreciate some other things about it.

I have loved none but you … weak and resentful I have been, but never inconstant. You alone have brought me to Bath. For you alone I think and plan.” In these few lines Frederick admits his foolishness, both in the distant and near past. He is also telling Anne that his desire to be near her is the reason he’s come—on the off chance that she thinks he showed up merely wanting to take a hot soak. And the best of all, in my opinion, he tells her that she has never really been out of his thoughts.

As the captain of a ship, Wentworth understood the thrill of the chase, but he also understood that without careful planning, the chase was likely to fail. His rank made him responsible for the success of any mission he was given, he was responsible for the ship and every man on it. All the assets on the ship were under his authority. He was responsible for returning to the Admiralty the ship in the same condition, or improved, and above that, bringing to the Crown’s coffers as many other ships as he could capture, their crews, and their assets. This was no small feat. By the look of his bankbook, he was very good at his job, and very good at planning.

Passion, on the other hand, is very simple. Passion drove Lydia and Wickham. Passion doesn’t always end so badly, but it doesn’t end wonderfully, magically, whimsically, and sensuously in real life nearly as often as it does in fiction. In reality, I see the initial spark fizzling out and the couple drifting apart. What I think Frederick tells Anne is that the initial passion he felt for her didn’t fade, but deepened into something more vital, and more enduring. He’s saying that he thinks about her, he watches her, and he looks eagerly to their future together.

There are times I watch romantic movies and think, “I wish … “ But I live in the real world. Both our adult children live with us, plus our granddaughter, and the whimsy of romance is crowded out by toys, other people’s schedules, and trying to keep up with the laundry. Oh, and writing. Passion looks different after 30 years. Bill comes home at midnight—he works second shift—and he gets something to eat. We sit together in a finally quiet house and watch old reruns of Everybody Loves Raymond. He tells me about his workday and I tell him about mine. We go to bed and take comfort in knowing the other is nearby.

I think Frederick and Anne would understand this sort of life and give it a nod of approval.

Take care–Susan Kaye

April Giveaways

Austen Authors is proud to announce our April Giveaways. Fortnight Quiz #1 was posted yesterday. Visitors have until midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on April 15 to send responses to contests@austenauthors.com.

The winner of Fortnight Quiz #1, who will be announced on April 16, will receive a copy of Jane and the Unpleasantness of Scargrave Manor, a book written by Stephanie Barron and donated by Mary Simonsen.

Fortnight Quiz 2 will be posted on April 16, and responses are due by midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on April 30. The winner of this second quiz will receive a very unique gift from our own Susan Kaye. Susan is offering up a cross-stitched Jane Austen bookmark (similar to the one on the left), and the winner will have the opportunity to choose his/her favorite Jane Austen quote as part of the prize. 
If working through a quiz is not your particular style, winning is still possible at AuAu. Simply by leaving comments on our blogs and extras, one is eligible to win. The more often one comments, the more chances to win. We encourage everyone to visit daily and participate. Leaving five comments throughout the month gives one five chances to win. Likewise, leaving a comment each day increases one’s chances by six fold. At the end of the month, names of all commenters will be placed into Random.org, and winners will be chosen for the following prizes:

an unsigned copy of Only Mr. Darcy Will Do by Kara Louise and donated by Sourcebooks

an autographed copy of  The Darcys and the Bingleys by Marsha Altman


an autographed copy of The Trouble with Mr. Darcy by Sharon Lathan

“I Love Jane” dangly earrings donated by Cindy Jones

an autographed copy of Murder at Mansfield Park by Lynn Shepherd

an autographed copy of The Darcy Cousins by Monica Fairview


A Fool’s Errand

by
J. Marie Croft
Definition of ‘April Fool’
No, my photo is not meant to be an illustration of an ‘April fool’.
The definition of ‘April Fool‘ is:
“the March fool with another month added to his folly”
(from The Devil’s Dictionary by Ambrose Bierce, 1911)
The origin of April Fool’s Day is controversial and a subject worthy of an exclusive blog post. This isn’t that post. In a nutshell, references to April 1st foolishness have been traced back to the 1500s, even to Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, and further back to the time of Noah. The most common belief is that April Fool’s Day originated with ancient pagan rites of spring.
Another theory involves the change from the old Julian calendar (which was outdated and its days numbered). The Gregorian calendar moved the beginning of the year from April to January; and the folks who were unaware of, confused over, or stubbornly refused to recognize the reform were sent on futile fool’s errands … hence April Fool.
In France the term is ‘Poisson d’Avril‘ (April Fish), and paper ones are fastened to unwary victims’ backs. Personally, having had hundreds of the real thing dumped over me years ago, one little paper fish seems harmless. Nevertheless, I’ll be on my guard today for red herrings, lest I be made a fool.
A ‘fool’ is defined as a silly or harmlessly deranged person. (Was it merely coincidence my blog post was scheduled for April Fool’s Day?) An alternate meaning of ‘fool’ is a jester or clown in a noble household. Uh oh … I feel a pun coming on.
When asked by the King for a joke, the fool just shrugged.
It was a court gesture.
While our house of cards contained neither kings, queens, nor knaves, in my family I was certainly not the only joker in the pack. My mother, at four foot ten inches, was ‘full of beans’.
My grandfather and his daughter-in-law, my mom, got along like a house on fire, which is fortunate since they lived in the same dwelling. He was illiterate, but mom was more than happy to read the newspaper to him. Every evening my grandfather met with his cronies for a chinwag to discuss the latest village news as well as that from the daily paper. My mom, the little minx, often misrepresented information from the articles she read to him. She exaggerated details, fabricated entire stories, and generally fed the poor man a bunch of bull. It was all done in good fun, of course. All in good fun, he came home, better informed, and chased her around the house. That happened many years before I was born, but I never tired of hearing about it and shall probably write a similar scenario into a story.
Today I’ll tell you about another prank – a spectacular hoax which took place in London. That humdinger of a humbug, perpetrated by a humorist, humbled its victim and caused a hum of chatter throughout the city on an otherwise humdrum day.
The great Berners Street Hoax (which is mentioned, in passing, in my book Mr. Rochester Takes the Plunge) occurred not during the Bronte sisters’ time but during that of another famous female writer. Oh, what was her name … Aster … Aston … Austin?
The prank did not take place on April Fool’s Day but on Tuesday, November 22, 1810. Theodore Hook (composer of comic operas) bet Samuel Beazley (architect and author) that for one day he could convert any London residence into the most popular address of the entire city. Hook had seven days to accomplish the task, and he spent that time writing 4,000 letters.
True to his word, one week later, the normally quiet home of Mrs. Tottenham, 54 Berners Street, became the talk of the Town. From first light till nightfall, the unsuspecting widow was

inundated with visitors and deliveries she had neither invited nor ordered.
The questionable list of arrivals includes a dozen chimney-sweeps and coal carts, vicars and priests, undertakers, a coffin, huge wedding cakes, casks of ale, servants seeking employment, twelve pianofortes, six stout men bearing an organ, fishmongers, wigmakers, cobblers, physicians, apothecaries, lawyers, butchers, bakers (with 2,500 raspberry tarts), furniture, flowers, fresh vegetables, the Governor of the Bank of England, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Lord Mayor of the City of London, the Chairman of the East India Company, and a duke or two.

The narrow streets became clogged with tradesmen and dignitaries; and, not surprisingly, tempers flared and fights broke out.
After watching the hijinks all day, Beazley paid Hook a guinea for winning the bet; and the two men departed the house they had rented across from Mrs. Tottenham’s. Although Theodore Hook eventually confessed to being responsible for the hoax, the wag never revealed why he chose the widow as his innocent dupe. One theory is there had been an argument between the two.
The Berner Street Hoax was certainly not the first time Londoners were cozened. On April 1st, 1698 (the debut of this particular ruse but not the last instance), people were invited to the Tower of London (via the non-existent ‘White Gate’) to witness the annual lion-washing ceremony. Although exotic animals (including lions and tigers and polar bears, oh my!) were kept in the Tower from the 13th century until 1834, there was no yearly ritual bathing of its big cats.
So, there you have it – my blog post for this month. Isn’t it ironic that on April Fool’s Day, the one day of the year dedicated to tomfoolery, I chose to write a fairly serious piece? Now, really, could I possibly resist misrepresenting a bit of information on Fool’s Errand Day? I am, after all, my mother’s daughter.
 

Our Novels

P&P: RC

P&PRC_badgered2Info on P&P:RC page

Be sure to vote!

*Giveaways

Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page
.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.

Our Imprint

Subscribe

Enter your email address to receive updates of our blog posts.

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact Us

Authors can be contacted via their email link on the Austen Authors page. For general information or to contact the admins, click the image to the left.

Archive

Categories