Jane Austen and the Worlds of Fantasy
Many of you know that I write fantasy.
Before I’ve come to write delightful Jane Austen fantasy spin-offs, I’ve created worlds entirely my own.
One such is the arabesque ancient world in my first novel Dreams of the Compass Rose (soon to be re-issued in paper print), written as a “collage” of interconnected stories in the manner of The One Thousand and One Nights. The Compass Rose universe is an ancient milieu where places have no names, cities spring forth like bouquets in the desert, gods and dreams walk the scorching sands in the South, ice floats like mirror shards upon the Northern sea, islands that do not exist are found in the East, death chases a thief on the rooftops of a Western city, immortal love spans time, and directions are intertwined into one road we all travel…. You come to this place when you wonder, and sometimes, only when you dream.
And then there is my epic fantasy world without color in Lords of Rainbow (also soon to be re-issued) where color is a myth and racial memory, and the mysterious event remembered as the Fall of Rainbow is ancient history. The seven deities of each color of the long-gone rainbow are a part of human myth and lore, while a silver sun shines on a land of infinite shades of gray, reflects brilliantly upon sharp metallic surfaces or sinks in oblivion upon dull matte places, defining contours of both forest or intricate cityscape, and there is no true black or white, no absolutes…
Both of the above are examples of wildly imaginative otherworld fantasy, also called “high fantasy,” “epic fantasy,” “hard fantasy.” So many terms!

Jane Austen, credit - JASNA website
But what about something less exotic, less recognizable as “fantasy,” maybe less extravagant?
Recently I’ve come to the conclusion that Jane Austen has created not just seven popular novels but her own fantasy world.
What’s the definition of a fantasy world? Indeed, what’s the definition of fantasy?
Usually what comes to mind when we hear the word “fantasy” are supernatural elements such as magic, monsters, fairies, vampires, ghosts, and other fairytale impossibilities.
But what about something more subtle?
Imagine a world of our own but seen through a very special curtain — a filter of sorts. It is a kind of self-contained fixed universe sliced out of some period in history (n this case, Regency), without magic or monsters, or any other weird elements, but a place definitely with its own special rules.
In such a “microcosm world” true love always conquers, there are only happy endings, the relationships are the most important aspect of daily existence, the goal of every unattached young woman is to get married to a well-settled pleasant gentleman, and the goal of every man is to be enchanted and loved by an extraordinary lady. In this same world, family bonds are complex and a source of delight and aggravation, but never true tragedy.
Indeed, tragedy in the real sense does not happen in this world — neither death nor hunger, nor war nor murder (it may be mentioned in passing or vaguely take place off screen). The worst that can to come to pass is disinheritance, public shame, prolonged illness, or a broken heart.

In this world time passes swiftly and the boring routine aspects of daily life are gleaned over, and only the sparkling, marvelous, stunning, and memorable events are recorded in memory.
Likewise, in such a world, the wicked get their comeuppance, the proud are brought low by the steadfast, genuine and, brave, while loyalty is rewarded by all worldly goods.
In such a world, the greatest weapon is wit and the method of doing battle is verbal sparring. Conflicts are eventually resolved, the villains denounced, and justice triumphs.
Here, all sensory physical elements are natural and rustic, or genteel and pleasant, the bread is freshly baked (with no preservatives), the dinner rich and lusty (with no guilt over fatty foods), and the teas and wines sweet and spiced just right (with no worries of inebriation).
Oh, and did I mention the weather? it is delightful, with crystal-clean fresh air and rejuvenating rain and sunny skies and fields of country green — and not even a hint of global climate change to put a sickening damper (or a belch of industrial smoke) on our dreamy reverie. Even the docks and poor residences are painted in vague, soothing dark overtones…. And the music? Why, classical romantic piano, of course! Because, yes, this world has, in place of overt magic, a gentle soundtrack!

Thus, in a nutshell, it is an idyll.
And without any hesitation, I’d call this world the greatest feat of magical imaginary wonder, the purest fantasy imaginable — a world which so many of us secretly long for, despite its lack of modern conveniences such as plumbing, or medical advances to keep us healthy and alive.
Was Jane Austen a secret fantasy author?
You decide!
Vera Nazarian
VERA NAZARIAN is a two-time Nebula Award Nominee, award-winning artist, and member of Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, a writer and reader with a penchant for moral fables and stories of intense wonder, true love, and intricacy.
17 Responses to Jane Austen and the Worlds of Fantasy
P&P: RC
Be sure to vote!
*Giveaways
Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.















































































































Facebook
RSS
Twitter
The Writers Block
LOL. Vera, you spun that nicely! I usually say that I love to loose myself in my world of fiction, but it would be just as appropriate to say it is a fantasy world!
BTW, Action Jane is my office mascot. She beautifully adorns my desk and is the cause of much conversation. Thanks again!
Thanks, Becky!
It’s true that often the notions of fiction worlds and fantasy worlds are blurry or interchangeable, but in Austen’s case, she really does seems to have created a microcosm!
So glad you are enjoying the action figure of our splendid Jane! She is awesome, ain’t she? With writing desk and quill pen action! LOL!
Vera, I’ve so often considered Jane Austen’s world to be a fascinating break from reality, especially as Mr. Darcy, tall, dark and handsome (and despite his initial haughtiness) is one fine fantasy!
Lord of the Rainbow sounds very, very intriguing! (I may have to hunt that one down.)
Best,
Susan
Thanks, Susan!
Seriously, who else can be said to have created such a yummy sexy male icon as Darcy?
Lords of Rainbow is currently out of print (and please feel free to find a used copy), but if you want to wait, it is coming soon, to be reissued in hardcover, trade paperback, and ebook… Thanks for your curiosity about it!
Your fan base is going. I had someone tell me that their first venture for “non-traditional Austen” was one of your books. Best of luck with your new re-release.
Ooh, thanks for letting me know, Mary!
I consider Regency Romances written in the last 50 years to be fantasy taking place in a shared world that never existed, one where there are 6 unmarried dukes on every street corner, all servants were faithful unto death, and women are allowed to break rules that would have ruined them in the actual regency period. But it’s a fun fantasy world!
Abigail,
Hah! YES, you nailed it with the quirks of the so-called “Regency world,” LOL! Six eligible dukes on every corner indeed, and they are all reformed rakes, to boot!
In a sense all fiction is a type of fantasy, I suppose. I think Jane Austen creates a fairy-tale world in Pride and Prejudice, and that’s what we respond to. But there’s enough realism in there to keep it grounded, which is why we “recognize” the characters 200 years later.
Congratulations on re-releasing Compass Rose!
Oh sure, Monica, you are absolutely right that all fiction is fantasy in a sense, but in some ways Austen’s worlds are very much painted with a special delicate dreamy veneer, more so it seems to me than many other authors.
As for Dreams of the Compass Rose, it is now re-issued in ebook, and coming soon in paper print formats too — thanks!
You argue a good case for any departure from reality being fantasy of sorts. I guess all fiction would be fantasy.
Enjoyable read! Thanks!
So glad you enjoyed!
I have always thought it the greatest of fantasies to believe that everyone walked along muddy, dusty roads dotted with horse droppings and sat or danced in non-air conditioned rooms while managing to keep their clothing ultra-white! I have a cupboard full of chemicals and an agitating washer but can’t keep my socks clean. Then there is the fantasy of basic human nature apparently disappearing for several decades.
But of course that is why we love escaping into a past world of our imagining. It just gets scary when this fantasy world is taken as the literal truth. Great post, Vera. As a huge sci-fi/fantasy fan myself, I completely comprehend the correlation! I mean, as much as I love Star Trek and admire Roddenberry’s vision, I am not waiting for Vulcans to descend from the skies.
Perfectly said, Sharon! And so profoundly true considering you are a SF/F fan and know exactly where this is coming from!
I had to come back and comment because it’s a day later and I’m still thinking about this idea. I completely agree with Monica’s comments above. This made me start thinking about the Austen “purist’s” objections to all or some fan fiction. I’ll probably bring down the wrath of the literary gods here by saying that the Austen purists have little imagination and no sense of fun. I personally think Jane would have loved how her characters have lived on and had new and different lives from the ones she imagined. She certainly had a sense of humor. I think she would have been thrilled that we love her characters so much we feel compelled to invent new stories in the rich fantasy world she created.
It isn’t the wrath of the literary gods you need to fret over, Susan, because like all gods (small “g”) they have a wicked sense of humor! I somehow doubt they are nearly as stuffy as purists of literature think they are. LOL!
I, of course, 100% agree with you on all the rest and since the wrath of those who think they are literary gods have already been poured on me I don’t fear saying it again.
Susan, very well said!
Also, not sure if anyone here is a purist or not (these days even the definition of purist is evolving), but it is something we need to remember — that everyone who has ever written literature of any kind throughout history, is writing fan fic of sorts — Shakespeare used popular stories as plots for this masterpieces, etc.
And then there’s this thing called cultural literary heritage, the baggage of the rich tradition we all have been exposed to and which colors and shapes our own imaginary bents, no matter how “original” we think we are.
So, purist is a relative term too…