Courtship, Regency Style

SusanCommunionWith Valentine’s Day nearly upon us, it’s pretty hard to ignore all the red hearts and sentimentality currently about, especially if you haven’t found “Mr. Right”, who, for many of us, bears a striking resemblance to one Fitzwilliam Darcy of Pemberley. Well, if you think it’s difficult to find a man like Mr. Darcy in the twenty-first century, just imagine attempting it in the nineteenth, where propriety was demanded at all times—especially during courtship.

In Regency England, a woman’s sole occupation was to attract a husband. It sounds easy enough, but, in actuality, it was a bit more complicated than one might think. For one thing, there were rules to follow, each designed to protect and preserve a lady’s reputation and standing in Society. Not only was it unacceptable for a respectable woman to seek employment of any kind, it was scandalous for an unmarried lady to appear in public without a chaperone, or to openly express an interest in a gentleman. Propriety dictated she must wait patiently for the prospective suitor to express his admiration for her, never the other way around.

Should a promising gentleman just happen to express his interest, however…well, there were a few more rules to follow. Intimate touching, for instance, was not permitted, nor was familiarity of address—meaning the gentleman and lady in question were required to address each other formally at all times, never by their Christian names. Letter writing was not allowed, nor was gift giving; and under no circumstances was the couple to be left alone together. That would lead to implications of marital intent.

So, what could a courting Regency couple do? Well, to be honest, not much; there was, however, walking and dancing. On a walk—carefully chaperoned, of course—the couple could easily engage in discreet conversation by lagging behind the rest of their party. As dancing usually required a man and woman to hold hands at frequent intervals throughout the set, it provided an acceptable way for them to engage in physical contact, under the watchful eyes of an entire assembly, of course. It also provided another opportunity for partners to converse discreetly.

As a writer, however, I sometimes find my characters, who often have very strong minds of their own, ignoring propriety. The following passage is a very short excerpt from my novel-in-progress, In Doubt of Mr. Darcy. It’s a pretty good example of what wouldn’t be acceptable between an unmarried couple (especially in the darkened back hall of an assembly room)! I hope you enjoy it.

As she made to move past him a second time, Darcy reached out and captured one of her hands in his own. Elizabeth inhaled sharply at the contact.

“Miss Bennet,” he said lowly, “I would never wish to keep you from your family, but I have a request I would make of you, if you would be so generous as to hear me.” Here, he increased the pressure upon her hand and swallowed audibly once more. When she did not object, but remained silent, he continued. “Will you grant me the honour of dancing the next with you; that is, if you are not otherwise engaged?”

Elizabeth could do nothing but stare at his hand, which held her own so firmly that she could not think beyond the wondrous impropriety of it. The exquisite warmth of his touch rapidly suffused her gloved fingertips, the length of her arm, her entire body. It tantalised and tempted her in ways she had always been forbidden to consider. She dared not raise her eyes to look upon his face, nor into the depths of his own eyes. From past instances, she knew his piercing gaze was most likely trained upon her with an intensity that would only serve to discompose her completely. She parted her lips, but words failed her utterly.

Since Lydia’s shameful elopement had Elizabeth endeavoured to forget him, but without success. She had endured months of continued disappointment and regret, and it was only very recently—the matter of no more than a few short days—that she felt she had finally begun to make some sort of progress, however slight, in tempering her longing for this impossible man before her.

She could not but be furious with herself for her body’s treacherous reaction to Darcy’s nearness. A burning indignation, not only for his presumptive forwardness and impropriety, but also for his lengthy absence and previous disregard simmered in the pit of her stomach. Why had he sought her out alone in a darkened hall after he had essentially deserted her months ago without so much as a parting word!

In an effort to calm her rising temper, as well as regulate other, far more disturbing sensations within her body, Elizabeth took a deep breath and attempted to pull her hand from Darcy’s firm grasp, but to no avail. Her cheeks, much like her hand, burned; her shock from her failure to free herself acute. “I need not remind you that we are in public, sir,” she admonished in a low, slightly unsteady voice. “I do not wish to be the subject of another scandal, nor provide fodder for any of the gossips in attendance. I am sorry, but my dance card is full.”

 

Many thanks for reading!

Best,

Susan

Susan Adriani

Susan Adriani is the author of The Truth About Mr. Darcy.

29 Responses to Courtship, Regency Style

  • Jane Odiwe says:

    Lovely Susan! I love the fact that we are able to write as if inside our heroine’s heads -I wonder if Jane ever dared to do so in private even if she, herself, was ruled by propriety in her own time!

    • Jane, I’ve often wondered the same thing myself. Jane Austen’s characters are so full of feeling and, in many cases, blessed with a passionate nature. I love fleshing out characters – especially characters as beloved as those from Pride and Prejudice – and climbing inside their heads. I don’t think I’ll ever get tired of doing it.

  • Deirdre says:

    ” I need not remind you we are in public, sir”. “I do not wish to subject to another scandal.” For holding someone’s hand, it can cause a scandal! It always sort of boggles my mind that they made courtship so difficult back then. Makes me understand the concept arranged marriages a little better.

    Looking forward to reading more! Off to make some Valentine’s cookies for my little ones. Have a lovely Valentine’s Day to you and yours!

  • Deirdre, thanks so much for commenting. It is mind boggling, isn’t it? But I have to say I love the formality of the regency period, and that includes the constant chaperoning.

    Valentine’s cookies sound heavenly about now! I’ve been digging out from under 3 ft. of snow for the last three days and let me tell you, I’m beat!

    Enjoy your Valentine’s Day! My daughter and I have made it our own special holiday. Oh, and my husband, too, lol. ;)

  • Awl! Elizabeth! How could you be so mean to dear Darcy!!! Give the man a hand, a thigh, something to hold!

    LOVE the tension between the couple, Susan!

    • Nina, I had a feeling you would, but it’s comforting to learn that my instincts were right! (I’m always glad when I do something right, lol.) :) Congratulations on your wonderful nomination for Compulsively Mr. Darcy – I’m honestly thrilled for you!

  • Loved learning more about Regency courtship, Susan, and your excerpt was wonderful !! :)

  • Carole in Canada says:

    The rules were strict but Darcy is up for the challenge! Love this little teaser you have given us! Can’t wait for more!

  • Jakki L. says:

    I cannot imagine how difficult it was back then to secure a husband, let alone a suitable one. Thank goodness I live in today’s society! I would hate to think of my fate in the 19th century. :wink:
    Great excerpt, Susan! Can’t wait to read the book in its entirety! :grin:

    • I know, Jakki. I’m very thankful that I live in the 21st century – for many reasons! I’m a worrier by nature, so I can only imagine my nerves would match Mrs. Bennet’s if I had to remain indoors and keep my eyes downcast and my opinions to myself!

  • Sophia Rose says:

    It would have been a little scary in ways because that sort of courtship would still leave a lot of unknown between the couple and even a lot of naivete in how to be in a relationship.

    Food for thought- thanks for sharing, Susan!

    • Sophia, I’ve often thought the same thing. My husband’s great grandmother (who was Italian) found herself betrothed after a very, very short time to a young man who, while she was attracted to him and respected him, didn’t know him well. Fortunately for both, their admiration blossomed into a mutual, constant love. (But I’ve heard similar stories that didn’t end so nicely!)

  • Lisa S says:

    Loved your post Susan and yet I take these courtship rituals with a grain of salt. There may have been “rules” but rules were meant to be broken, as demonstrated throughout pretty much every single Jane Austen novel. I mean, Darcy had no problem meeting up with E pretty much daily on her walks in Kent. JA didn’t elaborate on what those daily strolls entailed but it was pretty evident that no one else knew about them and they were unchaperoned. Even so, it didn’t concern either E or D and I think those strolls were the true cornerstone of the D&E relationship. Yes, he was intrigued with her wit and vivacity while they were all at Netherfield, but he truly got to know her character while on those many strolls that JA tells us next to nothing about. Quite the tease, that Jane Austen. Even though I’m obviously P&P centric, the same can be said of many of the other couples of JA’s novels. Elinor and Edward spent quite a bit of time alone strolling about and getting to know one another in S&S and, of course, Edmund and Fanny (MP) and Emma and Knightley (E) were like family to one another and both of those couples spent an inordinate amount of time alone together, and none of their parents/guardians were concerned about it. Edmund was the only one who spent any time with Fanny and he did it all the time. So, I’ve covered, P&P, S&S, MP, and E. What books of JA’s am I missing? Persuasion? That one is hard to say since JA never showed us Capt W’s and AE’s courtship. I like to imagine that when they were in the first flush of young love, they spent a lot of time alone getting to know one another. It’s not hard to imagine given the lackadaisical parenting of her father and the fact that he was completely clueless.

    Anyway, loved the post, just think that, as JA showed, very few actually followed these “rules” to the letter. And most weren’t all that concerned about the consequences of breaking them — and that includes the parents and guardians of those of courting age.

    • Lisa, you bring up some excellent points! There is so much in Jane’s novels to give us pause, especially with regard to what was and was not acceptable between a man and a woman, be they courting or not.

      Like you, I’m “P&P centric” as you call it, but Persuasion has always been a close second. I’ve often imagined Anne and Wentworth’s courting days – where they may have gone, or how they may have acted. While I believe Lady Russell would have had an eye on Anne, I can’t argue that her father and sisters would have been completely oblivious to everything that concerned her.

  • Lúthien84 says:

    I loved the excerpt and your post on Regency courtship, Susan. I was wondering why Darcy had disappeared from Meryton society after Lydia’s elopement. I’m dying to know what happened there. :wink:

    • Evangeline, I’m so glad you enjoyed it. I promise I’m working on finishing this story, so you’ll be able to have your questions answered – hopefully sooner than later. :)

  • Michelle Fidler says:

    I learned the rules you mentioned from reading Austen sequels. Darcy did manage to get a letter to Elizabeth to explain everything about Wickham, etc.

    Some people still believe in old-fashioned courtships like that. I read about it in the newspaper once or twice. Maybe it was about a father who wouldn’t let his daughter date but she had to have the old-fashioned courtship. That makes me think that maybe him, his daugher, and her beau could be sitting on the front porch in rocking chairs talking.

    • Michelle, that’s certainly something to consider, isn’t it? Some of my husband’s relations had similar experiences, but fortunately for them they fell in love at the end of it. I don’t know about you, but I was painfully shy growing up. I can’t imagine sitting on a porch swing having to make conversation with my father between us!

  • Lisa S says:

    Oh, I loved the excerpt though. It’s seems quite angsty though. :)

    • Lisa, I’m so glad to hear you enjoyed the excerpt! Now that you mention it, this story is a bit more angst-ridden than what I normally write. But don’t worry – I’m a happily ever after kind of girl, so you know that Darcy and Elizabeth will be together in the end…maybe even before that. ;)

  • Karana says:

    I love the regency rules on courtship. Lends a sort of elegance. I followed some rules of propriety in my courtship with my husband and always had a chaparone until our wedding day, and he did not believe in PDAs, so some might find it a bit dry. I enjoyed your excerpt too and hopefully we will be presented with a new novel to read soon.

    • Karana, I agree about the elegance. I think it’s lovely that you and your husband followed some proprietary rules during your courtship. My husband and I did as well, though you might not think so after reading my novel. ;) He’s very private, and doesn’t like PDA either, but on our wedding day, when the priest told everyone to offer each other a sign of peace, instead of taking my hand my husband bent to kiss me. I was so shocked that I botched the entire gesture by pulling away!

  • Julie Freeman says:

    I am looking forward to reading this. Thank you!!

  • I am excited by the possibilities, Susan. Thank you for sharing.

  • Carol Hoyt says:

    The more I read and study the regency period, the more complex it is .
    I always enjoy the different presentations each author gives us.

    Thank you for the except. Definitely got my interest!

  • Boston Sheryl says:

    Thank you so much for this lovely piece, Susan – gives one a lot to ponder. Sometimes I feel that I miss the chivalry and gentlemanly manners of the Regency period – today’s men don’t seem to hold a candle to their forefathers. On the other hand, a woman’s choices were so restricted. Could I have been happy sitting around, waiting to be married and hoping the right one comes along? And heaven forbid if you weren’t born in the upper echelons of society! Thanks again, and I can’t wait to read your novel. :wink:

Our Novels

P&P: RC

P&PRC_badgered2Info on P&P:RC page

Be sure to vote!

*Giveaways

Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page
.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.

Our Imprint

April 14

JAGuideThriftGuest Post

Comment to be entered into the Giveaway!

Subscribe

Enter your email address to receive updates of our blog posts.

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact Us

Authors can be contacted via their email link on the Austen Authors page. For general information or to contact the admins, click the image to the left.

Archive

Categories