Monthly Archives: May 2011

Page 5 of 512345

At Mr. Darcy’s Expense

J. Marie Croft
I’ll probably never write a serious story. Attempts at penning profound, powerful, poignant pieces fall flat because characters flatly refuse to fall in line. I’m no pushover. I’ve raised two daughters; they had boundaries, were taught proper behaviour, and caused very little trouble. Why have I no authority over obstreperous fictitious personas? OK, so I am a pushover; but in such weakness, perhaps I’ve found a strength.
Making a laughing stock of beloved P&P characters may be irreverent; but I can’t resist placing clever, impeccable, aloof Fitzwilliam Darcy in farcical situations. I’d probably have done the same to intelligent, fastidious, stiff Mr. Spock had I  been writing when I was a Trekker. In Austen’s words:
“The wisest and the best of men … may be rendered ridiculous
by a person whose first object in life is a joke.”

Although it’s certainly not my first object in life, I have reworked a joke into a P&P scenario; and, yes, Mr. Darcy is the butt of it. In The King’s Speech, Colin Firth brilliantly portrayed a monarch with a stammer. As frustrating as that stutter must have been for King George VI, his affliction pales in comparison to poor Darcy’s handicap in this little anecdote.

The Gentleman’s Speech
Cursed with a debilitating speech impediment (dated from Elizabeth Bennet’s rejection at Hunsford), Fitzwilliam Darcy could only utter six words per month. Unintentionally given hope by Lady Catherine, Darcy made plans to renew his offer of marriage to Elizabeth. For seven long months he remained silent, carefully scrimped and saved his words, and anxiously prepared his second proposal.
Upon return to Hertfordshire, Darcy gathered his courage and, ever heedful of his limited word count, spoke for the first time in over half a year. “You are too generous to trifle with me. If your feelings are still what they were last April, please tell me so at once. My affections and wishes are unchanged, but one word from you will silence me on this subject forever.”

Elizabeth, whose bonnet fit snugly over her ears, turned to him and said, “Pardon?”
___________________
Speaking of Darcy’s return to Hertfordshire, I’ve written a short story about that very subject; and ideas often came upon me unexpectedly. While hiking along a wooded trail, I caught a whiff of a particular odour. Out of the blue, Darcy and Elizabeth began a conversation in my head about onions.  Off came my backpack and out came a scrap of paper and a pen.  Such story bits can be recorded on my phone, but I was not alone and felt absurd dictating dialogue.  (Isn’t it ironic I’d be uncomfortable with absurdity?)

In my opinion, beneath a veneer of reserve and impeccable manners, Darcy is a passionate man. Like an onion, you just have to peel away his layers of clothing. (Oops! For a moment there, my fingers wandered off in an entirely different direction than intended.) Since I do not write steamy love scenes, I’m glad other Austen Authors’ pens dwell on Darcy’s hot-blooded nature and the peeling away of his fastidious Regency layers. However, if you like a bit of comedy, the Darcy in my stories usually has a sense of humour; and he’s whimsical. Oh, I just love that word … ‘whimsical’.
“But perhaps he may be a little whimsical in his civilities,” replied her uncle.

Yes, if you peel away another of Darcy’s layers, I’m sure you’ll find Mr. Gardiner has the right of it. The man is whimsical, in both senses of the word – changeable but playful, volatile yet fanciful, capricious though droll. At least that’s the way I like to write his character.
For many months that phrase, ‘a little whimsical in his civilities’, clunked around in my head like a pair of sneakers in the dryer. Yes, yes, I should have put the athletic shoes on the rack and the phrase on the shelf, or the back burner, or out of harm’s way somewhere. I didn’t. So, here’s the link to A Little Whimsical in His Civilities at The Writer’s Block. Not only do I avoid writing torrid love scenes, I also give a wide berth to angst. A Little Whimsical in His Civilities will not bring tears to your eyes, although it does come complete with onions.
“Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies, do divert me, I own,
and I laugh at them whenever I can.”

Oh, I’ll not only laugh at them. I’ll continue writing whimsey at all costs … mostly at Mr. Darcy’s expense. He’s wealthy and can afford it.

Susan Adriani’s Book Launch (a.k.a. Where in the World is Mr. Darcy?)

by Susan Adriani

Sunday was THE BIG DAY—the official release date of The Truth About Mr. Darcy (formerly titled Affinity and Affection)—only, it felt pretty much the same as any other day.

Instead of stuffing my husband and daughter into the car against their wills and dragging them from store to store to hunt down a copy of my book in the wild (like I contemplated doing), we went for ice cream at what we’ve affectionately dubbed the cow ice cream place,’ where scoop upon scoop of farm-churned goodness awaited us. It’s always fresh and delicious. (The ice cream, not the cows.)

First thing Monday morning, though, I was in the car, zipping off to my favorite bookstore with a grin on my face and anticipation fluttering in my belly like a flock of butterflies—big, gauzy blue ones. (They’re always so pretty when I see them at the Botanical Garden.)

I sang along with the radio. I waved merging drivers into my lane with a smile. When I arrived at the book store, I found a fantastic parking space—Right. Out. Front. The rays of good fortune were obviously shining down on me. Everything was glorious—and why not? It was, after all, the day after my BIG DAY.

Sadly, I quickly learned my fantastic parking spot right out front was also the perfect place from which to read the many, many signs plastered on the windows, boldly announcing that the store was closing in two weeks. Because I have no sense of self-preservation, I closed my gaping mouth, climbed out of my car, and went in anyway.

Needless to say, they did not have my book on any of their shelves, which happened to be for sale at what I thought were ridiculously reasonable prices for solid oak construction. I considered buying one, but didn’t think it would actually fit in my house. (Not to mention my husband might very well do away with me—it was massive.)

After wandering aimlessly for quite some time—because the entire store was in complete chaos—I stumbled upon a lone copy of Mary Simonsen’s The Perfect Bride for Mr. Darcy for only $5.98. (!!!) C. Allyn Pierson’s Mr. Darcy’s Little Sister was there, too—and Sharon Lathan, and Abigail Reynolds, and Lynn Shepherd—each just $5.98! Things started to pick up after that, but only marginally—remember, they still didn’t have my book.

And neither did the book store in the mall, or the one 30 minutes away, or Target—and neither do I, come to think of it. I ought to—I wrote it, revised it, edited it, edited it, edited it, edited it, edited it (you get the idea), and pretty much obsessed over everything about it for a very long time. To make a long story shorter—much, much shorter—I’ll just jump to the very end and tell you that I have but one question that I’m absolutely desperate to have answered: Where in the world is Mr. Darcy? My Mr. Darcy, that is.

I suppose what it pretty much boils down to is this: after eighteen months of preparation and anticipation, my BIG DAY was painfully anti-climatic. To celebrate (because I really ought to celebrate in some manner that doesn’t include ice cream), I’ve decided to post the entirety of chapter three right here. (I’m not sure if Sourcebooks actually allows their authors to do this, but my publicist is currently on vacation, so I’m just going to go ahead and do it anyway.)

This chapter was actually my favorite chapter to write. It’s between Darcy and Bingley and no one else. I won’t say anything more, other than I sincerely hope you’ll enjoy it.

Thank you so much for reading, and helping me celebrate the launch of The Truth About Mr. Darcy. Oh, and if you would be so kind as to help me find him by checking a bookstore near you, that would be really, really great!

Best,
Susan

The Truth About Mr. Darcy, Chapter Three

When Bingley arrived home that evening, Darcy was engrossed in a book in Netherfield’s library. “How was your evening, Bingley?” he asked absently as he turned a page. “I hope Mrs. Phillips’s society was to your liking.”

“An excellent question, Darcy,” he responded heatedly as he threw himself into a chair by the fire, “but perhaps you might do better to inquire after the pleasure of Miss Elizabeth Bennet’s evening, of which I can most heartily assure you there was none.”

Darcy closed his book immediately. “Miss Elizabeth Bennet? To what do you refer, Bingley?”

“I refer, Darcy, to the disturbing and insulting behavior I witnessed toward her this evening at the hands of your so-called friend George Wickham!”

Darcy’s blood ran cold. Had he heard Bingley correctly? His Elizabeth accosted by Wickham? Bingley’s expression told him all. Darcy leapt to his feet as his anger took a firm hold over his senses. “What in God’s name did he do to her? Damn it, Bingley! You must tell me you protected her! Please tell me she is unharmed!”

Darcy was incensed and, in his rashness, took several threatening steps toward Bingley, a maneuver that caused his friend to jump from his seat and retreat several paces.

Raising both hands to Darcy’s chest, he replied in earnest, “Yes, she is safe! She is safe, Darcy! Calm yourself, man! She was only in conversation with him, and not long, though I must tell you it was most distressing to watch. I believe he must have said such things to her that would never bear repeating in polite company, for she refused even to tell Jane—er, I mean Miss Bennet—what they were. At one point, she actually attempted to strike the libertine.”

Darcy looked at Bingley with incredulity. “Elizabeth struck Wickham?” His unguarded use of her Christian name was lost on his friend.

“No,” Bingley stammered. “He caught her hand before she could make contact, and that scoundrel kissed it, not at all inclined to release her, I might add. It was then when I went to her.”

Darcy raked his hands through his hair, utterly sickened by the prospect of Wickham touching any part of Elizabeth’s person. He began pacing the length of the room, praying for some modicum of control to return. “And what of her father? What of her uncle? Colonel Forster and the other officers? Did no one else do anything in her defense? Surely, you could not have been the only person to go to her aid? I find it impossible to accept an entire house full of people, including members of her own family, could be blind to such a scene!”

Bingley shook his head. “I could hardly believe it myself, but I was absolutely the only person aware of the nature of the exchange between them. Mr. Bennet was not present, her mother and sisters were engaged, and not even that half-wit of a clergyman, who has all but glued himself to her for the last five days, had any knowledge of the insult. I did happen to speak to Colonel Forster, though. He was most disturbed when I informed him of the incident and has promised most faithfully to personally look into the matter. I plan on riding to Longbourn tomorrow to speak to Mr. Bennet. I feel he should be made aware of the events that have transpired.” He hesitated a moment. “I have been thinking, Darcy, perhaps it would be best if you were to accompany me, given your past dealings with Wickham and your insight into his character. I believe Miss Elizabeth’s father has a right to know of what he is truly capable.”

Darcy strode to the window and leaned his forearm against the casement, staring out into the night. Several minutes passed in silence before he finally spoke, his voice ragged with feeling. “I should have been there with her. This never should have been allowed to happen. She would not have left my sight for a moment.”

Bingley shook his head. “Darcy, it was only by chance I caught the exchange between Miss Elizabeth and Wickham. I fail to see how you could have prevented what you may not have noticed yourself.”

It was simply too much. All the frustration he felt from his endless struggle against his overpowering feelings for Elizabeth caused Darcy to explode. “I would have been aware of it, Bingley! I, who am most excruciatingly conscious of her every movement when I am in her company! I see every smile she bestows, every expression of tenderness, every breath that fills her lungs—none of which is ever for me!” He swallowed hard and tried desperately to compose himself.

Bingley’s mouth dropped open. After a moment, he closed it and said, “I must confess I am at a loss. I had no idea you had tender feelings for Miss Elizabeth. Pray, how long have you felt this way?”

Striving to collect himself, Darcy muttered, “Forgive me. It has been so for many weeks now. I am only surprised you failed to notice it, because it was most easily discerned the other day in very little time by George Wickham.” He let his forehead rest against the glass, allowing its coolness to soothe him.

“Does Miss Elizabeth know?”

Darcy sighed. “That I am in love with her? No, and I would be most grateful if it were to remain that way.”

“But surely you mean to tell her?”

“No, Bingley, I assure you I do not.”

“But why, Darcy? Why would you endeavor to keep such extraordinary feelings hidden from her? What could ever be gained by it? Do you not think Miss Elizabeth would welcome your addresses?”

“No,” he said evenly, “she would not. She does not return my regard, and I would be lying to myself if I believed differently. Even if, by some stroke of exquisite good fortune, Miss Elizabeth were to love me, it would in no way change our circumstances. I cannot make a fortuneless country beauty the mistress of Pemberley, no matter how desperately I may desire it. Duty to my family—to my position in society—strictly forbids such a union between us.”

“Duty to your position?” Bingley cried. “Duty to your position be hanged! What about your duty to yourself, Darcy? Would it not bring you incredible joy and comfort to make Miss Elizabeth your wife and to see your children running through the halls of Pemberley? Would you not truly be content to grow old with her by your side? Do you honestly expect me to believe your family and your friends—all those who most desire to see you happy in life—would wish instead for you to spend your days alone and in misery, or worse, married to another in a loveless union, simply because the one woman you happened to fall in love with does not move in the same social circles as they do? I cannot accept it. Elizabeth Bennet is the daughter of a gentleman, and she is in every way a lady. You are equals; no one can deny that.”

Darcy turned away from the window and faced him. “But what of her mother, Bingley? What of her younger sisters, her aunts and uncles? Certainly you must recognize their behavior and low connections must materially lessen the chances of one’s marital felicity. Anyone who chooses to align themselves with such a family would be shunned in London society. Her family would never even be acknowledged, never mind accepted. I would not wish that upon Miss Elizabeth. I would not wish it upon anyone whom I hold dear.”

“And this should be of significant consequence? The insipid opinions of the London ton, whose favor and disfavor, approval and censure, are so easily bought and sold like tradeable goods? No one who conducts themselves in such a manner could ever esteem a man of your impeccable character and intellect in the first place, Darcy! And, surely, your family would not be so insensible and unfeeling as to follow their example. Would you have me act in such an irrational manner? Would you have me make myself unhappy—expect me to give up my Miss Bennet—for no better reason other than Caroline’s and Louisa’s selfish disdain for the connection?”

Darcy did not respond.

“Do you not approve of my relationship with Miss Bennet, Darcy?”

Darcy winced. He had not wanted it to come to this, especially tonight. “I am sorry, Bingley, but I cannot. You clearly do not understand the consequences and the disgrace you will suffer should you continue in your endeavor to align yourself with such a family. It would be your ruin. I cannot speak any plainer than this.”

Bingley was angry; Darcy had never seen him more so. “You are correct, Darcy, I do not understand anything of the sort! I do, however, comprehend the wretchedness Miss Bennet and I would suffer were I to allow myself to be so disgracefully persuaded from following the counsel of my own heart on such a matter! No, Darcy. That is a consequence I am most unwilling to suffer for any person, be they relation or friend, and most especially for any damned, misguided notion of duty!” He turned then and stormed from the room, leaving Darcy alone with much to consider.

The Truth About Mr. Darcy is available right now in bookstores…somewhere, I hope. In case you can’t find it either, here’s a link for Amazon:

THE TRUTH ABOUT MR. DARCY by Susan Adriani

The Better Mash-Up: An Exoneration of a New Literary Genre – Part II

by Vera Nazarian

Last month, I introduced many of you to the curious notion of what constitutes a better literary mash-up (part I) by way of Gilroy, California, garlic ice cream, chocolate and peanut butter, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, and other improbable but somehow harmoniously combined, wildly different elements.

If you missed last month’s “foods and literature” entry, do read it first to catch up on the fun discussion. Go on, I’ll wait…

Photo by Penarc

Now, then.

We’ve established that part of the appeal of that first recent modern mash-up that started the current craze, is a funny combination of shock value, conflicting chick vs. macho entertainment, and propriety clashing with crassness—basically a slightly perverse need to “despoil.” It’s the glee that rowdy kids get from scaring the stuffy older aunt, or frat boys crashing a garden party.

And of course, this kind of thing is disdained—frequently for good reason—by the Janeite purists.

However, is that entirely fair?

Photo by André Karwath aka Aka

And here is where we come to the heart of the discussion.

I propose that what makes a good literary mash-up—or combination of different previously unrelated elements into one new greater whole—are three things:

  1. The mash-up author’s ultimate intent and motive in creating the new work.
     
  2. The level of respect for the original classic.
     
  3. The execution.

These three elements work together to produce something that either works or doesn’t. The result can be anything, ranging from a shoddy forgettable story, or a brand new brilliant classic—and everything in between. And that’s why it is so important to have no preconceptions, but to treat each literary mash-up on its own merits. After all, each book is written (for the most part) by a different author, released by a different publisher, and may or may not be a complete dud or a hidden masterpiece.

Seriously!

You just never know until you try!

And now, let’s explore those three very important elements that work together to create a good mash-up (or not). Let’s take a closer look at each one.

Author’s Motive and Ultimate Intent 

This one is probably the most important element, because the author’s motive tells us why the book was written in the first place. And once we figure it out, we get a very solid sense of what the book is trying to tell us, and in turn, how to respond to the new story (or if we even need bother). So let’s look at some of the many possible reasons why a mash-up is written:

  • To make money.
  • To make the reader laugh at the silly (“stupid”) old classic.
  • To make the reader laugh in camaraderie together with the author of the classic.
  • To expand the good elements of the original and make them even more resonant.
  • To despoil the classic entirely by stomping all over its beloved tropes.
  • To shock the reader by rough unexpected juxtapositions.
  • To delight with amusing and “Wow, wouldn’t that be cool?” things happening.
  • To show off the new author’s cleverness and upstage the author of the classic.
  • To introduce a whole new type of reader to a book they otherwise would never try.
  • To challenge the reader into new ways of thinking.
  • To create something altogether profound using this quirky mash-up mode.
  • To get the non-reader to pick up a classic book.
  • To make a fitting tribute and pay homage to a favorite classic author.

There are plenty more reasons. But isn’t this just amazing to think how much our perception of a book is changed when we figure out what the author was trying to do with it?

And the neat thing is, this analysis applies not only to mash-ups, but to any books we read. It’s just that, since mash-ups are getting a bad rep, it’s time to put this Serious Lens of Closer Scrutiny on them.

Respect for the Original Classic 

This is the second element that goes into the making of a mash-up. Depending on the mash-up author’s attitude toward the classic original, we get a book that is a mockery or a tribute, or all things in-between. The new author can:

  • Respect and adore the original (work and author) to the point of high worship.
     
  • Like the original well enough, but be a little tired of the classic.
     
  • See quite a number of flaws in the original and just “itch” to improve upon it.
     
  • Hate the classic with a passion, and want to display it in a fully negative light.
     
  • Be completely indifferent about the classic—it’s just another writing job to do.
     
  • Be entirely unfamiliar and ignorant of it, having never read it before.
     
  • Have an opinion, but be willing to do whatever it takes to please fans or the publisher.

Again, there are plenty of other attitudes, feelings, personal preconceptions and hang-ups an author can have about the classic original. And also there is the extent to which the author may be wiling to overcome any and all of them, to make a successful project. This works in tandem with the first element (their motive), to make or break the book.

And incidentally, this analysis can also apply to all fanfic writing.


The Execution 

The third important element of this formula for mash-up success or failure, is the quality of execution. Among the things that determine the execution are:

  • The quality of the writing itself. Is the new author clunky or competent?
     
  • The seamlessness of style—whether the new material meshes well with the original.
     
  • The amount of new material inserted—too little results in negligent change, too much, and the end product no longer resembles the original and departs from the classic.
     
  • The nature of the new inserted elements. What are they? Are they chosen to be funny, wise-ass, silly, shocking, ridiculous, thought provoking, anachronistic, beautiful, romantic, heartwarming, profound? Because these elements give the new direction and color to the mash-up!
     
  • The placement of the new elements into the original text. Are they too far apart, or too much all in one place? Long stretches of nothing new happening?
     
  • Subtlety vs. crudeness. Face it: some things just don’t really work together. Or else you need an entirely brilliant explanation of why they do.
     
  • The amount of care taken to blend all new and old elements of the story into something that makes sense, and makes a greater new and sufficiently entertaining story.
     
  • A sense of humor! A mash-up does not have to be funny, but almost all are. Sure, humor is very personal, but some things are funny across the board, for very many people.
     
  • A strong familiarity with, and understanding of history—the original time period, society, and mores. An author really should know what she or he is writing about! Because readers are smart and can tell when things are factually wrong!

In short, think how all these three elements work together to make a successful mash-up or a shoddy one. And considering all the intricacies at play, why not give this new genre a chance, even if you are an absolute purist!

Here is a list of some fun mash-ups for you to explore. Be ready to love or hate them! But even more, be ready to be utterly surprised

Because you never know what kind of wonderful entertainment, joy, and insight you might be missing!

April’s Fortnight Quiz #2 – Answers and Winner

April’s second fortnight quiz brought a hotly contested response, with three people tied for first. The winner will receive a cross-stitched bookmark, customized with the person’s favorite Jane Austen quote. Random.org chose the winner for us, but first before we announce that person, here are the questions and the correct answers.

  1. Margaret Dods was a pseudonym for _______? Christian Isobel Johnstone
  2. Who is Mary Wollstonecraft’s famous daughter? Mary (Godwin) Shelley
  3. What is Sharon Lathan’s favorite book? J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings
  4. What might one call “foot clogs supported upon an iron ring that raised the wearer a couple of inches from the ground”? pattens
  5. To what film music does Mary Simonsen suggest her Austen character theme songs? “Mama Mía”
  6. Who wrote The British at Play: A Social History of British Sport from 1600 to the Present? Nigel Townson
  7. In Juliet Archer’s Micro-Sequel, what two scents trigger Lady Catherine’s “fond” memories? Lavender and Roses
  8. Which actress played both Elizabeth Bennet in 1952′s Pride and Prejudice and Anne Elliot in 1961′s Persuasion? Daphne Slater
  9. When and where was the first speed skating race held? on the Fens in England in 1763
  10. Which groups are known as the “old line organizations”? Rex, Comus, Proteus, Twelfth Night Revelers, Knights of Momus
  11. Which Austen Author actually briefly met Colin Firth? Regina Jeffers
  12. What is a “drabble”? short, short stories of 100 words or less
  13. Which krewe is credited with throwing the first medallions/doubloons at Mardi Gras? the Krewe of Rex (1884)
  14. Who wrote Jane Austen: A Family Record? Deirdre LeFaye
  15. The last shot of 1995′s Persuasion is of a ship silhouetted against a sunset. From what film was the shot taken? 1984′s The Bounty
  16. What was the original title of The Ballad of Gregoire Darcy? Manner of Devotion
The winner of April Fortnight Quiz 2 is Missy Brooks. Missy, please contact Regina at contests@austenauthors.com to claim your prize. Include your name, mailing address and the Jane Austen quote that you would like Susan Kaye to cross stitch on your customized bookmark. Congratulations!!!
May’s Fortnight Quiz #1 was posted on May 1. Responses must be received by midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on May 15 to be eligible. 

Marsha Altman’s Monthly Post

This was supposed to be my launch post for The Ballad of Gregoire Darcy, but the publishing date was pushed back to May 10th, so we rescheduled the launch party for May 19th. Turns out the book is out anyway, though I still don’t have a copy. So feel free to order it.

People think that the launch is a very exciting time, and it’s true that it is, but it also involves a lot of waiting and staring at sales numbers, wondering how accurate they are, and what you can do to get them up (or should have done). My favorite moment in the process is actually when my agent calls me to announce the sale to the publisher. We sent another book out this week – a proposal for a book of Talmudic business ethics for the Chinese-language market – and we’ll see if they give me money to write it. Of course I’m already on to my next projects:
(1) I’m getting together some short stories that occur prior to or during the events of The Ballad of Gregoire Darcy, which I will release for free as a promotional item on all e-Reader formats as well as a free .pdf file on my site. There’s one story left to write, about Mugin and Georgiana Bingley hanging out in London, but I’m stuck in the middle of (at this point unnecessary) research for it. Hopefully the small collection will be out by the end of the month.
(2) I’m thinking of e-publishing my sci-fi novel Towerland, which failed to sell to publishers about 2 years ago because nobody’s buying new authors in sci-fi. It needs a serious revision though.

(3) I have to prep book 5, The Knights of Derbyshire, to send to the publisher. They have a second book clause in the contract called “right of first refusal” where the next book I write I have to submit to them first instead of other publishers, and they have 30 days or whatever to decide whether they want to put an offer on it. I wouldn’t actually want to go to other publishers, but that’s what the terms actually are in the contract to prevent authors from jumping ship. Ulysses Press will probably ask to wait until preliminary sales come back from book 4 to make a decision, which is not unreasonable. I hope book 5 is published, because it’s a fan favorite – many people feel it’s the best book in the series, or that’s what they used to say before I finished book 10. My favorite book is actually book 8, the one that takes place almost entirely in Tokugawa Japan, but book 5 is a pretty close second in tie with book 10.
(4) If I finish all of this stuff, I can finally play Fallout 3: New Vegas. Brandy Scott gave it to me as a Hannukah present, and I’ve been holding off playing it because I know I’ll disappear for 1-2 months into the hole while playing it, just like I did with Fallout 3. So it’s either video games or having a career, and I need health insurance to it’s got to be the latter for the time being.
If you’re interested to see what I’m reading for research and general enjoyment, you can follow me on Goodreads, which is a useful networking site for book lovers.

April Giveaway Winners

Austen Authors is happy to announce the winners of our April Giveaways. Those listed below should contact Regina at contests@austenauthors.com to claim your prizes. Include your name and mailing address in the email.

an unsigned copy of Only Mr. Darcy Will Do, by Kara Louise (donated by Sourcebooks) – Lisa S.

an autographed copy of The Darcys and the Bingleys, donated by Marsha Altman – Lieder Madchen
an autographed copy of The Trouble with Mr. Darcy, donated by Sharon Lathan – LilMissMolly
a pair of “I ‘Heart’ Jane” earrings, donated by Cindy Jones – Jakki L.
an autographed copy of Murder at Mansfield Park, donated by Lynn Shepherd – Meredith
an autographed copy of The Darcy Cousins, donated by Monica Fairview – Suzan

Morning Light finally dawns!

By Abigail Reynolds

So, who remembers marine biologist Cassie Boulton and reclusive writer Calder Westing from my book The Man Who Loved Pride & Prejudice (aka Pemberley by the Sea)? Today is a big day for them! They’ve been waiting oh-so-patiently (okay, so Calder’s been patient, Cassie – not so much, and let’s not even go into what Senator Joe Westing says about the delay!) to make a return appearance in my new novel Morning Light. It’s been an unusually long haul getting this book to see the light of day (as it were), going through multiple revisions and lots of publisher delays about do-we-or-don’t-we, but it’s finally here. Yes, my new Persuasion-inspired modern novel Morning Light is now available! Well, sort of. Like everything else about this book, the release has been complicated by various problems, so the paperback won’t be available for another couple of weeks even though the e-book is already up at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Smashwords. But hey, given that I finished writing the book in 2006, what’s another couple of weeks?

Morning Light is set in the seaside village of Woods Hole on Cape Cod about a year after the end of The Man Who Loved Pride & Prejudice. Artist Annie Wright, who runs the Cape Light Gallery, likes her life free of complications, especially complications of the male persuasion. She loves her job, her volunteer work rescuing abandoned dogs, and her good friends Cassie and Calder, and that’s enough for her. She doesn’t like to talk about her past, especially how she became a widow after just a few years of marriage. But one day her past walks right into the Cape Light Gallery in the form of her dead husband’s best friend Jeremy, the man who left the country because it was too hard to see Annie married to someone else. If this weren’t enough, Annie finds herself in charge of an abused and distrustful pile of fur called Bear, and increasingly entangled in the complicated Westing family politics.

Ten years apart hasn’t done anything to reduce the magnetic attraction between Annie and Jeremy, but there is plenty standing in their way. In Jeremy’s case, it’s the woman he was meaning to marry since he could never have Annie, and for Annie, it’s the painful memories of her marriage and the years apart from Jeremy. Then things get REALLY complicated for them, but I won’t spoil the surprise by telling you what happens. Meantime, Calder’s parents aren’t the sort to stay in the background and manage to get involved in Jeremy’s life as well, leading to an exciting climax at a gala charity event for Annie’s dog rescue organization where everything goes unexpectedly wrong for all of them. But love will save the day for all of them. It’s a happy ending all around – yes, even for Joe Westing this time. Sort of. Maybe. You’ll have to tell me what you think.

You don’t need to have read The Man Who Loved Pride & Prejudice to enjoy Morning Light. The story stands alone, but readers who loved Cassie and Calder’s story will be happy to see how their life together develops. When I started writing Morning Light, it was meant to be an updated Persuasion just as The Man Who Loved Pride & Prejudice is an updated P&P, but as I discovered there are parts of the Persuasion story that simply don’t adapt to modern times, the plot took some detours. The basic outline of lovers separated for years remains, as do the fundamentals of the main characters and the importance of patience, strength of character, and love that strengthens through separation, but some of the themes play out differently. The presence or lack of artistic talent takes the place of social class, and Annie’s struggles with her own family reflect the question of how much to allow others to influence her destiny. Morning Light follows its own modern course, but it’s truly inspired by Persuasion and Jane Austen.

I hope you join me in visiting Woods Hole and the lives of some of my favorite characters in this long-delayed release. So, which Austen book would you like to see updated next?

May Giveaways


It is time once again to celebrate at Austen Authors with new and exciting giveaways for our visitors. First, we have items for our fortnight quiz participants that we know they will love. Fortnight Quiz #1, which was posted to our site yesterday, runs through midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on May 15.

This quiz comes from this site’s original February 1-14, 2011, posts. Participants may check the archives on the bottom left sidebar for help in responding to the questions. The person with the most answers correct will win Pride and Prejudice paper dolls, donated by Kara Louise. Fortnight Quiz #2 will be posted to the site on May 16 and will run through midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on May 31, 2011. It covers the February 15-28 posts from our authors. The winner for that quiz will receive Jane Austen stationery, donated by Karen Wasylowski. All responses must be sent to Regina at contests@austenauthors.com. In case of a tie, winners will be chosen by Random.org.

If responding to trivia questions is not your “cup of tea,” then you may still win prizes on Austen Authors simply by leaving a comment on the various posts found on the site. The more times one comments, the greater his chance of winning. If one leaves two comments for the month, his name is placed in the mix only twice. If one leaves twenty comments, he has twenty chances to win. We encourage everyone to visit daily and join in the lively discussions on our site. We speak everything Jane Austen. May’s monthly winners will be posted on June 2, 2011. Here are this month’s gift offerings:


a copy of the Pride and Prejudice 2005 DVD, donated by Jack Caldwell

an autographed copy of What Would Mr. Darcy Do? from Abigail Reynolds

 

an autographed copy of The Truth about Mr. Darcy, donated by Susan Adriani

from Cindy Jones, an autographed copy of My Jane Austen Summer, along with a box of Lily Berry’s Pink Rose tea from Bingley Teas

an autographed copy of None But You, donated by Susan Kaye

from Marilyn Brant comes an autographed copy of According to Jane

May Fortnight Quiz #1


Our first fortnight quiz for May will run through May 15 and is based on the February 1-14, 2011, posts found on this site. If one cannot remember the answers, he may revisit the original posts in our archives found on the bottom left sidebar. Participants must respond by midnight Eastern Daylight Savings Time on May 15, 2011, to be eligible.

For this first quiz, visitors are vying for a set of Pride and Prejudice paper dolls, which are donated by Kara Louise. Send responses to contests@austenauthors.com. Here is the quiz:

  1. What is a “starling murmuration”?
  2. Which Pride and Prejudice character does Jane Odiwe lampoon in her post?
  3. How many excerpts on “love” were offered from our books on the Valentine weekend post?
  4. Name the four actors who have portrayed Captain Frederick Wentworth.
  5. In what year was the British Meterological Office founded?
  6. Vera Nazarian has been nominated for a Nebula Award twice. For what two stories did she receive this honor?
  7. What was the name of the song that accompanied the “Great Lovers” slide show?
  8. Where was the 1849 Cadbury Brothers Exhibited Chocolate held?
  9. Which Alan Hollinghurst character is discussed in the Faulks on Fiction episode?
  10. With what nationalities does Vera Nazarian identify herself?
  11. What was the Aristotle quote regarding love?
  12. What is the title of Mary Simonsen’s only non-Austen book?
  13. Which novelist is credited with establishing the Regency romance genre?
  14. For what does the acronym JAFF stand?
  15. What three film roles did Helena Bonham Carter give us in 2010?
  16. Karen Wasylowski’s “friend” confused Pride and Prejudice with another famous movie/story line. Identify that “mistake.”
  17. When did Chaucer pen “Parlement of Foules”?
Page 5 of 512345

Our Novels

*Giveaways

Enter our monthly contest using the Rafflecopter form on the
Giveaway Page
.
All rules and prizes are listed there! Click the image or link provided.

P&P200

Our "real time" behind-the-scenes story of the events in
Pride & Prejudice
is ongoing. To read all the portions in order visit The Writers Block or click the image above.

Contact Us

Authors can be contacted via their email link on the Austen Authors page. For general information or to contact the admins, click the image to the left.

Archive

Categories

May 14

Shannon Winslow
debuts! 

GIVEAWAYS 

May 20

Guest: Amy Smith

GIVEAWAY

June 4

Marsha Altman
release party!

GIVEAWAY

June 7

Colette Saucier debuts!

June 11

Regina Jeffers
release party!

GIVEAWAY 

Visitors